User talk:UnicornTwilight

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Ye Olde Angel Of The Opera Debate

Please don't create pages for non notable, not even truly scheduled musicals like The Angel Of The Opera, and please don't mention it in other articles unless truly relevant. I have removed all these references. If you want to recreate these articles, please provide references from reliable sources indicating that this musical is in any way WP:NOTE&notable. Fram (talk) 12:20, 6 March 2008 (UTC)


Please correct me if I'm wrong, Fram, but I do believe that the page included a

 This user talk page or section is in the middle of an expansion or major revamping.
You are welcome to assist in its construction by editing it as well.
Please view the edit history should you wish to contact the person who placed this template. If this article has not been edited in several days, please remove this template. Consider not tagging with a deletion tag unless the page hasn't been edited in several days.

sign, meaning that when more people learn about the musical opera (as I call it), I could recive extra infomation from reliable soruces. In fact, I only knew that Lachlan carries a harp because my friend is rehersing for the part of Hillary Pupp in the musical, and knows infomation from a source most people would kill/die for-the creator of the musical herself.

I do not mean to sound rude. --UnicornTwilight (talk) 00:25, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Please check our reliable sources and notability guidelines. What we need are independent, reliable sources about the subject. There were no newspaper reviews, magazine articles, ... about the musical: not surprising, since it hasn't even a more or less fixed date yet. You were trying to promote a new musical, but Wikipedia is not the place to do so. We only should have articles on subjects after they have become notable, not before. The "in use" template has no bearance on that, and is not intended as a means to avoid deletion. Fram (talk) 08:49, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Your {{Prod}} of {{inuse}}

Hi there. You recently added a prod template to Template:Inuse without wrapping it in <noinclude></noinclude>. As a result you accidentally proded every single article that that template was on. :P Keep in mind that templates cannot be proposed for deletion. Instead, consider templates for deletion. Cheers. :) --slakr\ talk / 07:18, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Oops! And thank you. :P --UnicornTwilight (talk) 07:38, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of SAMPLEPAGE

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Deadly∀ssassin(talk) 08:12, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] REDIRECTEDPAGE

Thank you for experimenting with the page REDIRECTEDPAGE on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -- The Anome (talk) 08:22, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Vanners

Hi, thanks for the cleanup on the Gypsy Vanner article, it's one of those articles that needs serious cleanup by someone like yourself who is capable of resisting the urge to declare a particular breed capable of walking on water and leaping skyscrapers in a single bound! LOL! BTW, if you want to help with more breed articles, we have about 350 (see list of horse breeds) and there are plenty on the smaller, obscure breeds that need more sources and such. Check in at WikiProject Equine if you want some ideas of where we need the most help! Thanks! Montanabw(talk) 23:59, 17 May 2008 (UTC)