United States v. Harriss
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- This article is about the lobbying regulation case. For the "Ku Klux Case", see United States v. Harris.
United States v. Harriss | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Supreme Court of the United States | ||||||||||||
Argued October 19, 1953 Decided June 7, 1954 |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Holding | ||||||||||||
The Court upheld the act's constitutionality, but also by narrowed the scope and application of the act. | ||||||||||||
Court membership | ||||||||||||
Chief Justice: Earl Warren Associate Justices: Hugo Black, Stanley Forman Reed, Felix Frankfurter, William O. Douglas, Robert H. Jackson, Harold Hitz Burton, Tom C. Clark, Sherman Minton |
||||||||||||
Case opinions | ||||||||||||
Majority by: Warren Joined by: Reed, Frankfurter, Burton, Minton Dissent by: Douglas Joined by: Black Dissent by: Jackson Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. |
||||||||||||
Laws applied | ||||||||||||
Regulation of Lobbying Act |
United States v. Harriss, 347 U.S. 612 (1954), was a U.S. Supreme Court case applied directly to the Regulation of Lobbying Act.
Contents |
[edit] Proceedings and outcome
Lobbyists challenged the Regulation of Lobbying Act for being unconstitutionally vague and unclear. In Harriss, the Supreme Court responded by upholding the act's constitutionality, but also by narrowing the scope and application of the act. The Court ruled that the act applies only to paid lobbyists who directly communicate with members of Congress on pending or proposed federal legislation. This means that lobbyists who visit with congressional staff members rather than members of Congress themselves are not considered lobbyists. In addition, the act covers only attempts to influence the passage or defeat of legislation in Congress, and excludes other congressional activities. Further, the act applies to and restricts only individuals who spend at least half of their time lobbying.[1]