United States presidential election, 1992
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
‹ 1988 1996 › | ||||
United States presidential election, 1992 |
||||
3 November 1992 | ||||
Nominee | Bill Clinton | George H. W. Bush | Ross Perot | |
Party | Democratic | Republican | Independent | |
Home state | Arkansas | Texas | Texas | |
Running mate | Al Gore | Dan Quayle | James Stockdale | |
Electoral vote | 370 | 168 | 0 | |
States carried | 32+DC | 18 | 0 | |
Popular vote | 44,909,806 | 39,104,550 | 19,743,821 | |
Percentage | 43.0% | 37.4% | 18.9% | |
Presidential election results map. Red denotes states won by Bush/Quayle, Blue denotes those won by Clinton/Gore. |
||||
The United States presidential elections of 1992 featured a battle between incumbent President, Republican George Bush; Democrat Bill Clinton, the governor of Arkansas; and independent candidate Ross Perot, a Texas businessman. Bush had alienated much of his conservative base by breaking his 1988 campaign pledge against raising taxes, the economy had sunk into recession, and the president's perceived best strength, foreign policy, was regarded as much less important following the collapse of the Soviet Union and the relatively peaceful climate in the Middle East following the defeat of Iraq in the First Gulf War.
Contents |
[edit] Nominations
[edit] Republican nomination
See also: 1992 Republican presidential primaries, 1992 Republican National Convention
Republican candidates
- Patrick J. Buchanan, former speechwriter Senior Advisor to President Nixon from Virginia
- George H.W. Bush, President of the United States from Texas
- David Duke, State Representative from Louisiana
- Harold E. Stassen, former Governor of Minnesota and candidate for the 1944, 1948, 1952, 1964, 1968, 1976, 1980, 1984 and 1988 nominations from Pennsylvania
Conservative journalist Pat Buchanan was the primary opponent of President Bush. However, Buchanan's best showing was in the New Hampshire primary on 2/18/1992 - where Bush won by a 53-38% margin. President Bush won 73% of all primary votes, with 9,199,463 votes. Buchanan won 2,899,488 votes; unpledged delegates won 287,383 votes, and Duke won 119,115 votes. Just over 100,000 votes were cast for all other candidates, half of which were write-in votes for H. Ross Perot [1]
President George H. W. Bush and Vice President Dan Quayle easily won renomination by the Republican Party. However, the success of the conservative opposition forced the moderate Bush to move further to the right than in 1988, and to incorporate many socially conservative planks in the party platform. Bush allowed Buchanan to give the keynote address at the Republican National Convention in Houston, and his culture war speech alienated many moderates. David Duke also entered the Republican primary, but performed poorly at the polls.
With intense pressure on the Buchanan delegates to relent, the tally for president went as follows:
- George H.W. Bush 2166
- Patrick J. Buchanan 18
- former ambassador Alan Keyes 1
Vice President Dan Quayle was renominated by voice vote.
1992 election was the last with Stassen as a candidate.
former speechwriter and Senior Advisor to President Nixon Pat Buchanan of Virginia |
former Governor Harold Stassen of Minnesota |
[edit] Democratic Party nomination
See also: 1992 Democratic presidential primary, 1992 Democratic National Convention
In 1991, President Bush had high popularity ratings in the wake of the Gulf War. Many well-known Democrats considered the race unwinnable and did not run for the nomination. Those that did run included several less-well-known candidates. Some of the potential candidates who did not run included:
- House Majority Leader Dick Gephardt of Missouri
- Governor Mario Cuomo of New York
- Representative Pat Schroeder of Colorado
- Senator Lloyd Bentsen of Texas
- Senator Bill Bradley of New Jersey
- Senator Al Gore of Tennessee
- Reverend Jesse Jackson of Illinois
- former Senator George McGovern of South Dakota
- Representative Dave McCurdy of Oklahoma
- Senator Sam Nunn of Georgia
- Senator Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia
- Senator Dale Bumpers of Arkansas[citation needed]
Former Governor Jerry Brown of California |
|||
Former Senator Eugene McCarthy of Minnesota |
Former Senator Paul Tsongas of Massachusetts |
[edit] Overview
Clinton, a Southerner with experience governing a more conservative state, positioned himself as a centrist New Democrat. He prepared for a run in 1992 amidst a crowded field seeking to beat the incumbent President George H. W. Bush. In the aftermath of the Persian Gulf War, Bush seemed unbeatable but a small economic recession spurred Democrats on. Tom Harkin won his native Iowa without much surprise. Clinton, meanwhile, was still a relatively unknown national candidate before the primary season when a woman named Gennifer Flowers appeared in the press to reveal allegations of an affair. Clinton sought damage control by appearing on 60 Minutes with his wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton, for an interview with Steve Kroft. Paul Tsongas of Massachusetts won the primary in neighboring New Hampshire but Clinton's second place finish - strengthened by Clinton's speech labeling himself "The Comeback Kid" - re-energized his campaign. Clinton swept nearly all of the Super Tuesday primaries, making him the solid front runner. Jerry Brown, however, began to run a surprising insurgent campaign, particularly through use of a 1-800 number to receive grassroots funding. Brown scored surprising wins in Connecticut and Colorado and seemed poised to overtake Clinton but a well-publicized misstep involving Brown's Vice-presidential advances towards Rev. Jesse Jackson, apparently unaware of Jackson's complicated relationship with Jewish-Americans, set Brown back and Clinton effectively won the Democratic Party's nomination after winning the New York Primary in early April.
The convention met in New York City, and the official tally was:
- Bill Clinton 3372
- Jerry Brown 596
- Paul Tsongas 289
- Penn. Gov. Robert P. Casey 10
- Rep. Pat Schroeder 5
- Larry Agran 3
- Al Gore 1
Clinton chose U.S. Senator Albert A. Gore Jr. (D-Tennessee) to be his running mate on July 9, 1992. Choosing Gore, who is from Clinton's neighboring state of Tennessee, went against the popular strategy of balancing a Southern candidate with a Northern partner. Gore did serve to balance the ticket in other ways, as he was perceived as strong on family values and environmental issues, while Clinton was not.[2] Also, Gore's similarities to Clinton allowed him to push strongly some of his key campaign themes, such as centrism and generational change.[3]
The Democratic Convention in New York City was essentially a solidification of the party around Clinton and Gore, though there was controversy over whether Jerry Brown would be allowed to speak. Brown did indeed speak and ultimately endorsed the Clinton campaign.
Before Gore's selection, other politicians were mentioned as a possible running-mate, e.g. Bob Kerrey, Dick Gephardt, Mario Cuomo, Indiana Representative Lee H. Hamilton, Pennsylvania Senator Harris Wofford, Florida Senator Bob Graham, and Massachusetts Senator John Kerry.
Another additional controversy concerned Pennsylvania Governor Bob Casey, who sought a speaking slot at the convention but was not granted one. Casey complained that it was because of his outspoken pro-life views: he had warned the platform committee that Democrats were committing "suicide" because they did not support restrictions on abortion.[4] Clinton supporters have said that Casey was not allowed to speak because he had not endorsed the ticket.
[edit] Perot candidacy
The public's unease about the federal budget deficit and fears of professional politicians allowed the independent candidacy of billionaire Texan Ross Perot to explode on the scene in dramatic fashion - at one point Perot was the leader in the polls.[5] Perot crusaded against the national debt, tapping into voter's potential fear of the deficit. His volunteers succeeded in collecting enough signatures to get his name on the ballot in all 50 states. In June, Perot led the national public opinion polls with support from 39% of the voters (versus 31% for Bush and 25% for Clinton).[5] Perot severely damaged his credibility by dropping out of the presidential contest in July and remaining out of the race for several weeks before re-entering. He compounded this damage by eventually claiming, without evidence, that his withdrawal was due to Republican operatives attempting to disrupt his daughter's wedding. His presence, however, ensured that economic issues remained at the center of the national debate.
[edit] Other nominations
The 1992 campaign also marked the entry of Ralph Nader into presidential politics as a candidate. Despite the advice of several liberal and environmental groups, Nader did not formally run. Rather, he tried to make an impact in the New Hampshire primaries, urging members of both parties to write-in "none of the above." As a result, several thousand Democrats and Republicans wrote-in Nader's own name. Despite supporting mostly liberal legislation during his career as a consumer advocate, Nader received more votes from Republicans than Democrats.
The Libertarian Party nominated Andre Marrou, former Alaska representative and the Party's 1988 vice-presidential candidate, for President. Nancy Lord was his running mate. The Marrou/Lord ticket made the ballot in all fifty states plus Washington, D.C. and received 291,627 votes (0.28% of the popular vote).
Former United States Army Special Forces officer and Vietnam veteran Bo Gritz was the nominee of the Populist Party. He received 106,152 votes nationwide (0.10% of the popular vote).
Psychotherapist and political activist Lenora Fulani, who was the 1988 presidential nominee of the New Alliance Party, received a second consecutive nomniation from the Party in 1992. Fulani and running mate Maria Elizabeth Munoz received 73,622 votes (0.07% of the popular vote).
The U.S. Taxpayers Party ran its first presidential ticket in 1992, nominating conservative political activist Howard Phillips. Phillips and running mate Albion Knight, Jr. drew 43,369 votes (0.04% of the popular vote).
The newly formed Natural Law Party nominated scientist and researcher John Hagelin for President and Mike Tompkins for Vice President. The party's first presidential ticket appeared on the ballot in 32 states and drew 39,000 votes (0.04% of the popular vote).
[edit] General election
[edit] Campaign
After Bill Clinton secured the Democratic Nomination in the Spring of 1992, polls showed Ross Perot leading the race, followed by President Bush, with Clinton in third place after a grueling nomination process. However, as the economy continued to grow sour, the President's approval rating continued to slide, as the Democrats began to rally around their nominee. On July 9, 1992, Clinton chose Tennessee Senator and former 1988 Presidential candidate Albert Arnold Gore, Jr. to be his running mate[6]. As Governor Clinton's acceptance speech approached, Ross Perot dropped out of the race, being convinced that with a "revitalized Democratic Party," staying in the race would cause the race to be decided by the U.S House of Representatives[7]. Clinton gave his acceptance on July 17, 1992, promising to bring a "new convenant" to America, and to work to heal the perceived gap that had developed between the rich and the poor during the Reagan/Bush years. The Clinton campaign received the biggest convention "bounce" in history[8] which brought him from 25 percent in the spring behind Bush and Perot up to 55 percent to Bush's 31 percent.
After the convention, Clinton and Gore began a bus tour around the United States, while the Bush/Quayle campaign, in panic mode began to hammer at Clinton's character, in light of accusations of infidelity and dodging the draft. The Bush campaign emphasized its foreign policy successes such as Desert Storm, and the end of the Cold War. Bush also contrasted his military service to Clinton's lack thereof, and criticized his lack of foreign policy expertise. However, as the economy was the main issue, Bush's campaign floundered across the nation, even in Republican bastions[9], and Clinton maintained leads with over 50 percent of the vote nationwide consistently, while Bush typically saw numbers in the upper 30s[10]. As Bush's economic edge had evaporated, his campaign looked to energize its socially conservative base at the 1992 Republican National Convention in Houston, Texas. At the Convention, Bush's primary campaign opponent Pat Buchanan gave his famous "culture war" speech, hammering at Clinton and Gore's social progressiveness, and voicing skepticism on his "New Democrat" brand. After President Bush accepted his renomination, his campaign saw a small bounce in the polls, but this was short lived, as Clinton maintained his lead[11]. The campaign continued with a lopsided lead for Clinton through September[12], until Ross Perot decided to re-enter the race[13] Ross Perot's re-entry in the race was welcome by the Bush campaign, as Fred Steeper, a poll taker for Bush, said, "He'll be important if we accomplish our goal, which is to draw even with Clinton." Initially, Perot's return saw the Texas billionaire's numbers stay low, until he was given the opportunity to participate in two unprecedented three man debates. The race narrowed, as Perot's number's significantly improved as Clinton's number's declined, while Bush's numbers remained more or less the same from earlier in the race [14] as Perot and Bush began to hammer at Clinton on character issues once again.
[edit] Character issues
Many character issues were raised during the campaign, including allegations that Clinton had dodged the draft during the Vietnam War, and had used marijuana, which Clinton claimed he had pretended to smoke, but "didn't inhale." Bush also accused Clinton of meeting with communists on a trip to Russia he took as a student. Clinton was oft accused of being a philanderer by political opponents.
Allegations were also made that George H. W. Bush had engaged in a long-term extramarital affair with Jennifer Fitzgerald, who had been his secretary throughout the 1970s.[15] Bush denied ever having an affair with Fitzgerald.[16]
[edit] Results
On November 3, Bill Clinton won election as the 42nd President of the United States by a wide margin in the U.S. Electoral College, receiving 43 percent of the popular vote in the three man race against Bush's 37 percent. It was the first time since 1968 that a candidate won the White House with under 50 percent of the popular vote. The state of Arkansas was the only state in the entire country that gave the majority of its vote to a single candidate; the rest were won by pluralities of the vote.
Independent candidate Ross Perot received 19,741,065 popular votes for President. The billionaire used his own money to advertise extensively, and is the only third-party candidate ever allowed into the nationally televised presidential debates with both major party candidates (Independent John Anderson debated Republican Ronald Reagan in 1980, but without Democrat Jimmy Carter who had refused to appear in a three-man debate). Speaking about the North American Free Trade Agreement, Perot described its effect on American jobs as causing a "giant sucking sound." Perot was ahead in the polls for a period of almost two months - a feat not accomplished by an independent candidate in almost 100 years.[citation needed] Perot lost much of his support when he temporarily withdrew from the election, only to declare himself a candidate again soon after.
Perot's almost 19% of the popular vote made him the most successful third-party presidential candidate in terms of popular vote since Theodore Roosevelt in the 1912 election. Also, Ross Perot's 19% of the popular vote was the highest ever percent of the popular vote for a candidate who did not win any electoral votes. Exit polling indicated that Perot voters would have split their votes fairly evenly between Clinton and Bush had Perot not been in the race [17] , and an analysis by FairVote - Center for Voting and Democracy suggested that, while Bush would have won more electoral votes with Perot out of the race, he would not have gained enough to reverse Clinton's victory. [18] Clinton also led Bush in all polls after the Democratic Convention after Ross Perot's initial exit in two way races, and never lost the lead for the rest of the campaign.[19]
Although he did not win any states, Perot managed to finish ahead of one of the two major party candidates in two states: In Maine, Perot received 30.44% of the vote to Bush's 30.39% (Clinton won Maine with 38.77%); in Utah, Perot received 27.34% of the vote to Clinton's 24.65% (Bush won Utah with 43.36%).
This was the last election that saw the Democratic candidate winning the men's vote.
[edit] Analysis
Several factors made the results possible. First, the campaign came on the heels of the recession of 1990-91. While in historical terms the recession was mild and actually ended before the election, the resulting job losses (especially among middle managers not yet accustomed to white collar downsizing) fueled strong discontent with Bush, who was successfully portrayed as aloof, out of touch, and overly focused on foreign affairs. Highly telegenic, Clinton was perceived as sympathetic, concerned, and more in touch with ordinary families.
Second was the decision by Bush to accept a tax increase. Pressured by rising budget deficits, increased demand for entitlement spending and reduced tax revenues (each a consequence of the recession) Bush agreed to a budget compromise with Congress (where rival Democrats held the majority). Not having been in Congress at the time, Clinton was able to condemn the tax increase effectively on both its own merits and as a reflection of Bush's honesty. Effective Democratic TV ads were aired showing a clip of Bush's infamous 1988 campaign speech in which he promised "Read my lips ... No new taxes." In a semantic irony, President Bush did not add new taxes, only increasing existing taxes, but the implied meaning was clear, as he had explicitly stated in the speech, "My opponent won't rule out raising taxes. But I will. The Congress will push me to raise taxes and I'll say no."
Most importantly, Bush's coalition was in disarray, for both the aforementioned reasons and for unrelated reasons. The end of the Cold War allowed old rivalries among conservatives to re-emerge and meant that other voters focused more on domestic policy, to the detriment of Bush, a social and fiscal moderate. The consequence of such a perception depressed conservative turnout[20]. Unlike Bush, Clinton was able to unite his party behind his candidacy. Despite a fractious and ideologically diverse party, Clinton was able to court all wings of the Democratic party successfully, even where they conflicted. To garner the support of moderates and conservative Democrats, he attacked Sister Souljah, a little-known rap musician whose lyrics Clinton condemned. Clinton could also point to his centrist record as Governor of Arkansas. More liberal Democrats were impressed by Clinton's academic credentials, 60's-era protest record, and support for social causes such as a woman's right to abortion. Supporters remained energized and confident, even in times of scandal or missteps.
The effect of Ross Perot's candidacy has been a contentious point of debate for many years. In the ensuing months after the election, various Republicans asserted that Perot had acted as a spoiler, enough to the detriment of Bush to lose him the election. While many disaffected conservatives did vote for Ross Perot to protest Bush's tax increase, further examination of the Perot vote in the Election Night exit polls not only showed that Perot siphoned votes equally among Clinton, Bush, and those staying home if Perot had not been a candidate, but of the voters who cited Bush's broken "No New Taxes" pledge as "very important," two thirds voted for Bill Clinton. [21]. He also appealed to disaffected voters all across the political spectrum who had grown weary of the two-party system. NAFTA played a role in Perot's support, and Perot voters were relatively moderate on hot button social issues.[22][23]
Clinton, Bush and Perot did not focus on abortion during the campaign. Exit polls, however, showed that attitudes toward abortion "significantly influenced" the vote, as pro-choice Republicans defected from Bush.[24][25]
[edit] Implications
Clinton's election ended an era in which the Republican Party had controlled the White House for 12 consecutive years, and for 20 of the previous 24 years. That election also brought the Democrats full control of the political branches of the federal government, including both houses of U.S. Congress as well as the presidency, for the first time since the administration of the last Democratic president, Jimmy Carter. This would not last for very long, however, as the Republicans won control of both the House and Senate in 1994. Clinton would become the first Democratic President since Franklin Delano Roosevelt to serve two full terms in the White House.
[edit] Detailed Results
Presidential Candidate | Party | Home State | Popular Vote | Electoral Vote |
Running Mate | Running Mate's Home State |
RM's Electoral Vote |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Count | Pct | |||||||
William Jefferson Clinton | Democratic, Liberal (NY) | Arkansas | 44,909,806 | 43.0% | 370 | Albert Arnold Gore, Jr. | Tennessee | 370 |
George Herbert Walker Bush | Republican, Conservative (NY), Right To Life (NY) | Texas | 39,104,550 | 37.4% | 168 | James Danforth Quayle | Indiana | 168 |
Henry Ross Perot | (none) | Texas | 19,743,821 | 18.9% | 0 | James Bond Stockdale | California | 0 |
Andre V. Marrou | Libertarian | Alaska | 290,087 | 0.3% | 0 | Nancy Lord | Nevada | 0 |
James “Bo” Gritz | Populist | Nevada | 106,152 | 0.1% | 0 | Cy Minett | 0 | |
Lenore Fulani | New Alliance Party | New York | 73,622 | 0.07% | 0 | Maria Munoz | 0 | |
Howard Phillips | U.S. Taxpayers Party | Virginia | 43,369 | 0.04% | 0 | Albion Knight, Jr. | 0 | |
Other | 152,516 | 0.13% | – | Other | – | |||
Total | 104,423,923 | 100 % | 538 | 538 | ||||
Needed to win | 270 | 270 |
Source (Popular Vote): Leip, David. 1992 Presidential Election Results. Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections (August 7, 2005).
Source (Electoral Vote): Electoral College Box Scores 1789–1996. Official website of the National Archives. (August 7, 2005).
[edit] Close states
- Georgia, 0.59%
- North Carolina, 0.79%
- New Hampshire, 1.22%
- Ohio, 1.83%
- Florida, 1.89%
- Arizona, 1.95%
- New Jersey, 2.37%
- Montana, 2.51%
- Nevada, 2.63%
- Kentucky, 3.21%
- Texas, 3.48%
- South Dakota, 3.52%
- Colorado, 4.26%
- Wisconsin, 4.35%
- Virginia, 4.38%
- Louisiana, 4.61%
- Tennessee, 4.65%
[edit] Voter demographics
THE PRESIDENTIAL VOTE IN SOCIAL GROUPS (IN PERCENTAGES) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
% of 1992 total vote |
3-party vote | ||||||
1992 | 1996 | ||||||
Social group | Clinton | Bush | Perot | Clinton | Dole | Perot | |
Total vote | 43 | 37 | 19 | 49 | 41 | 8 | |
Party and ideology | |||||||
2 | Liberal Republicans | 17 | 54 | 30 | 44 | 48 | 9 |
13 | Moderate Republicans | 15 | 63 | 21 | 20 | 72 | 7 |
21 | Conservative Republicans | 5 | 82 | 13 | 6 | 88 | 5 |
4 | Liberal Independents | 54 | 17 | 30 | 58 | 15 | 18 |
15 | Moderate Independents | 43 | 28 | 30 | 50 | 30 | 17 |
7 | Conservative Independents | 17 | 53 | 30 | 19 | 60 | 19 |
13 | Liberal Democrats | 85 | 5 | 11 | 89 | 5 | 4 |
20 | Moderate Democrats | 76 | 9 | 15 | 84 | 10 | 5 |
6 | Conservative Democrats | 61 | 23 | 16 | 69 | 23 | 7 |
Gender and marital status | |||||||
33 | Married men | 38 | 42 | 21 | 40 | 48 | 10 |
33 | Married women | 41 | 40 | 19 | 48 | 43 | 7 |
15 | Unmarried men | 48 | 29 | 22 | 49 | 35 | 12 |
20 | Unmarried women | 53 | 31 | 15 | 62 | 28 | 7 |
Race | |||||||
83 | White | 39 | 40 | 20 | 43 | 46 | 9 |
10 | Black | 83 | 10 | 7 | 84 | 12 | 4 |
5 | Hispanic | 61 | 25 | 14 | 72 | 21 | 6 |
1 | Asian | 31 | 55 | 15 | 43 | 48 | 8 |
Religion | |||||||
46 | White Protestant | 33 | 47 | 21 | 36 | 53 | 10 |
29 | Catholic | 44 | 35 | 20 | 53 | 37 | 9 |
3 | Jewish | 80 | 11 | 9 | 78 | 16 | 3 |
17 | Born Again, religious right | 23 | 61 | 15 | 26 | 65 | 8 |
Age | |||||||
17 | 18–29 years old | 43 | 34 | 22 | 53 | 34 | 10 |
33 | 30–44 years old | 41 | 38 | 21 | 48 | 41 | 9 |
26 | 45–59 years old | 41 | 40 | 19 | 48 | 41 | 9 |
24 | 60 and older | 50 | 38 | 12 | 48 | 44 | 7 |
Education | |||||||
6 | Not a high school graduate | 54 | 28 | 18 | 59 | 28 | 11 |
24 | High school graduate | 43 | 36 | 21 | 51 | 35 | 13 |
27 | Some college education | 41 | 37 | 21 | 48 | 40 | 10 |
26 | College graduate | 39 | 41 | 20 | 44 | 46 | 8 |
17 | Post graduate education | 50 | 36 | 14 | 52 | 40 | 5 |
Family income | |||||||
11 | Under $15,000 | 58 | 23 | 19 | 59 | 28 | 11 |
23 | $15,000–$29,999 | 45 | 35 | 20 | 53 | 36 | 9 |
27 | $30,000–$49,999 | 41 | 38 | 21 | 48 | 40 | 10 |
39 | Over $50,000 | 39 | 44 | 17 | 44 | 48 | 7 |
18 | Over $75,000 | 36 | 48 | 16 | 41 | 51 | 7 |
9 | Over $100,000 | — | — | — | 38 | 54 | 6 |
Region | |||||||
23 | East | 47 | 35 | 18 | 55 | 34 | 9 |
26 | Midwest | 42 | 37 | 21 | 48 | 41 | 10 |
30 | South | 41 | 43 | 16 | 46 | 46 | 7 |
20 | West | 43 | 34 | 23 | 48 | 40 | 8 |
Community size | |||||||
10 | Population over 500,000 | 58 | 28 | 13 | 68 | 25 | 6 |
21 | Population 50,000 to 500,000 | 50 | 33 | 16 | 50 | 39 | 8 |
39 | Suburbs | 41 | 39 | 21 | 47 | 42 | 8 |
30 | Rural areas, towns | 39 | 40 | 20 | 45 | 44 | 10 |
Source: Voter News Service exit poll, reported in The New York Times, November 10, 1996, 28.
[edit] See also
- Bill Clinton presidential campaign, 1992
- Tom Harkin presidential campaign, 1992
- Bob Kerrey presidential campaign, 1992
- Paul Tsongas presidential campaign, 1992
- Chicken George
- “Giant sucking sound”
- History of the United States (1988–present)
- “Read my lips: No new taxes”
- United States Senate election, 1992
[edit] Further reading
- Abramowitz, Alan I. "It's Abortion, Stupid: Policy Voting in the 1992 Presidential Election" Journal of Politics 1995 57(1): 176-186. ISSN 0022-3816 in Jstor
- Alexander, Herbert E.; Anthony Corrado (1995). Financing the 1992 Election.
- Thomas M. Defrank et al. Quest for the Presidency, 1992 Texas A&M University Press. 1994.
- De la Garza, Rodolfo O.; Louis Desipio (1996). Ethnic Ironies: Latino Politics in the 1992 Elections.
- Goldman, Peter L.; et al. (1994). Quest for the Presidency, 1992.
- Jones, Bryan D. (1995). The New American Politics: Reflections on Political Change and the Clinton Administration.
- Steed, Robert P. (1994). The 1992 Presidential Election in the South: Current Patterns of Southern Party and Electoral Politics.
[edit] References
- ^ Our Campaigns - US President - R Primaries Race - Feb 01, 1992
- ^ Ifill, Gwen. "Clinton Selects Senator Gore Of Tennessee As Running Mate", The New York Times, 1992-07-10. Retrieved on 2008-03-27.
- ^ Al Gore from the United States Senate
- ^ The Atlanta Journal and The Atlanta Constitution May 19, 1992 Page: A/8
- ^ a b "The 1992 Campaign: On the Trail; Poll Gives Perot a Clear Lead", The New York Times. Retrieved on 2006-07-05.
- ^ THE 1992 CAMPAIGN: Their Own Words; Excerpts From Clinton's and Gore's Remarks on the Ticket - New York Times
- ^ Captain Perot Jumps Ship - New York Times
- ^ THE 1992 CAMPAIGN: Overview; Poll Gives Clinton a Post-Perot, Post-Convention Boost - New York Times
- ^ The Republicans: Can They Get It Together? - New York Times
- ^ PARTY IN THE SPOTLIGHT; Bush Trails, to Varying Degrees, in 3 Polls - New York Times
- ^ http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E0CE5DF113FF935A1575BC0A964958260&
- ^ THE 1992 CAMPAIGN; Clinton Takes 21-Point Lead Over President in a New Poll - New York Times
- ^ THE 1992 CAMPAIGN: Campaign Strategy; 2 Camps Regard A Perot Revival With Less Fear - New York Times
- ^ http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E0CE5DC1E3AF936A15753C1A964958260
- ^ Conason, Joe (July/August 1992). "Reason No. 1 Not To Vote For George Bush: He Cheats on His Wife." Spy magazine.
- ^ Kurtz, Howard (August 12, 1992). "Bush Angrily Denounces Report of Extramarital Affair as 'a Lie.'" The Washington Post.
- ^ THE 1992 ELECTIONS: DISAPPOINTMENT - NEWS ANALYSIS An Eccentric but No Joke; Perot's Strong Showing Raises Questions On What Might Have Been, and Might Be - New York Times
- ^ FairVote - 1992 Presidential Race
- ^ THE 1992 CAMPAIGN: Overview; Poll Gives Clinton a Post-Perot, Post-Convention Boost - New York Times
- ^ " THE TRANSITION: The Republicans; Looking to the Future, Party Sifts Through Past" http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E0CE2DF173EF932A25752C1A964958260
- ^ "Clinton Carves a Path Deep Into Reagan Country" http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E0CEFD8173FF937A35752C1A964958260
- ^ Public Opinion Watch
- ^ http://www.epi.org/briefingpapers/1993_bp_political.pdf
- ^ Donald T. Critchlow. Intended Consequences: Birth Control, Abortion, and the Federal Government in Modern America. (2004) p. 221
- ^ Abramowitz (1995)
- Outline of U.S. History: Chapter 15: Bridge to the 21st Century. Official web site of the U.S. Department of State. Retrieved on December 10, 2005.
- Bulk of article text as of January 9, 2003 copied from this page, when it was located at http://usinfo.state.gov/usa/infousa/facts/history/ch13.htm#1992 and titled “An Outline of American History: Chapter 13: Toward the 21st Century”.
- An archival version of this page is available at http://web.archive.org/web/20041103020223/usinfo.state.gov/products/pubs/history/ch13.htm.
- This page is in the public domain as a government publication.
[edit] External links
- 1992 popular vote by counties
- 1992 popular vote by state
- 1992 popular vote by states (with bar graphs)
- Film footage of Gore speech on the election campaign trail
- How close was the 1992 election? - Michael Sheppard, Michigan State University
|