Talk:University of Toronto Scarborough

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A mortarboard This article is part of WikiProject Universities, an attempt to standardise coverage of universities and colleges. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
Canada Portal
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada and related WikiProjects, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on Canada-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project member page, to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
Education in Canada
This article is part of the Education in Canada WikiProject (Discuss/Join).

In 2006, DSAs, Departmental Student Associations were introduced. They represent all students in their respective area of study. Some information should be added to reflect this change. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.141.46.22 (talk) 06:45, 13 April 2008 (UTC)


Omer stop trying to add your fucking name to the wiki - you are just a student with NO MEANINGFUL CONTRIBUTIONS!

Way to go Paul Bernando you've made it to the top of the list!

Someone should start an article on Doris McCarthy Thinker2006 04:57, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Who the hell is Doris McCarthy? Robust Physique 05:30, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Robust Physique, here are some information on Doris McCarthy http://www.utsc.utoronto.ca/~dmg/html/about/mccarthy.html Also, please refrain from adding that picture that you have tried to add in the page. A picture of constructions is certainly not a professional picture to have while portraying an university campus. I have reverted your edit back to Andrewuoft's version. Thinker2006 05:48, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Buddy, why do you keep trying to change the image to the construction of Foley Hall from 3 years ago? It's just a residence and has been completed for some time now.

The keyword to notice while adding the names in the notable alumni area, would be notable. Lao Wang and Omer Sheikh are not notable. Thinker2006 22:47, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Lao Wang is famous in Chinatown. Robust Physique 04:56, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
If you think Lao Wang is that famous then you should write an article in wikipedia about him.Thinker2006 12:30, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
I googled him, got nothing -> he's out and so's that stupid image of Foley Hall.
Google search is how you decide notability? I say he's in! Time will not forget Lao Wang's greatness. Robust Physique 00:12, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
I would actually agree with Andrewuoft here. I don't think Lao Wang is famous enough to be considered notable. People like McCarthy and Barnardo are known to a lot of us but Lao Wang I believe is a "nobody" outside the china town (as you have claimed he is famous in china town). In addition, that construction picture really doesn't belong here. I would let you all decide on the "notablity" of Lao Wang but I am removing the construction picture. Thanks. Thinker2006 02:21, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
And I say he's out! Google doesn't decide notability, but existence? You have yet to even tell us why he is so notable, assuming he even exists! If you want a famous guy in China town, try Kwai Chan Kane.
Lao Wang is a man of great honor and great courage, don't take his name in vain Robust Physique 05:35, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
I think you should explain what exactly Wang has done instead of repeatedly preaching Godly adjectives about him. I haven't found one single person in UTSC, who knows about Wang. Thinker2006 19:00, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
You asked everyone? Robust Physique 03:08, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
I asked your Mother, she agreed. HE'S OUT!
anyways, no I didn't ask everyone because there are 10,000 people. However, I am pretty sure that he is not notable because if he was he would have known largely not just by UTSC students but also by outside people. Just curious, why is it that you want so much to add Lao Wang? There must be a very good reason why you like him so much. If you could explain your reason, we might understand as well. So far, we know that you believe he was a great person, whose contribution will not be forgotten. Well, we don't know him at all. Thinker2006 02:39, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

I don't think Tom Enright ever attented UTSC

Tom Enright DID attend UTSC - read the article: http://webapps.utsc.utoronto.ca/ose/story.php?id=50 Graudated in 1976.

UTSC Cheerleading squad is NOT support by student fees - it's merely a club.

I don't know why, and I can only assume it's SCSU board members/executives/staff that are doing it, but it is not necessary to list every single thing the SCSU provides for students - it's a wiki about UTSC, not the SCSU and each little detail. No one checking wikipedia to find out what UTSC is will care that the SCSU sells metropasses! (in my ever-so-humble opinion, of course)

Contents

[edit] Name Change

I don't know how to change the title; but UTSC admin types recently got rid of the "at" and it's just University of Toronto Scarborough now.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.192.87.178 (talk • contribs) .

No official press mention yet that I can find, but I've moved the page in good faith that one is forthcoming since it looks like they're beginning to update their website. In the meantime, internal links to University of Toronto at Scarborough will redirect to the newly titled page. BFD1 15:08, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

I've received information that the name change is taking place on a marketing level, but that for all journalistic intents and purposes, it's still the University of Toronto at Scarborough (UTSC). In the continued absence of an official release, we have no secondary source to cite for the name change. A widespread revert may be in order, as the changes to this article and the University of Toronto now seem to have been premature. BFD1 12:55, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

In the UTSC website, only "University of Toronto Scarborough" can be found. But since the name change hasn't been announced officially, I think both names are acceptable at this time, although the title of this article should reflect the one used in the official website of UTSC.--64.231.71.33 16:06, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Not quite, unfortunately... The 2006-7 Student Prospectus uses "at", as do other parts of the site [1] [2]. I have no stake in what tack we take with the name; it would simply be nice to head off revert wars and inconsistencies on wikipedia. I personally think the most sensible thing to do would be to stick w/ the old name until an official announcement comes to pass. BFD1 18:32, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

It's true that some parts of the site still uses "at". On the other hand, all other parts, as well as the the title, and the copyright infos on the bottom of almost every page (including some of the pages you mentioned above) use "University of Toronto Scarborough" instead. What I'm saying is that both names may be considered "official" at this moment, although it seems better that the title of this article reflects the most prominent name used in the UTSC website.--64.231.71.33 16:27, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

This one really caught me off-guarded. I thought the Student Centre still says the campus name with the word "at". Also, the library itself doesn't have the word "at" but contains it in the article search engine.
OhanaUnited 02:02, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] "Censorship Controversy"

I have reverted this edit (see "Censorship Controversy") by User:Tangentkjhg until consensus on its inclusion can be reached. I think the following needs to be addressed:

  • Is the subject of this section sufficiently notable to be included in the article? This is the first I've heard of it; do we have a Reliable Source which can attest to its degree of importance in the history of the Scarborough Campus?
  • Does it adhere to WP:NPOV? If not, what needs to be changed?
  • Is there a better place for the section?

None of this is meant to detract from User:Tangentkjhg. It's an interesting and bold contribution, but I wonder whether it satisfies all criteria for inclusion. BFD1 14:53, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

If this section is suitable for inclusion, then I think the best place for it is where User:Tangentkjhg put it, because it is directly related to UTSC. But this is policy from 13 years ago. Please mention whether it is still applicable today, and whether there are multiple, non-trivial published works on this controversy other than one UBC professor. A controversy can certainly be written in a neutral point of view, so the question here should be notability. Pomte 03:03, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Derelict Balcony

Anyone knows where that is (other than the fact it's in Science Wing)? And how do you access it? OhanaUnited 04:12, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

I don't know, but if you access it, it won't be derelict anymore. –Pomte 04:20, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
I haven't heard of this balcony in Frosh orientation. That's why I'm wondering. OhanaUnited 15:04, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:University of Toronto Scarborough.jpg

Image:University of Toronto Scarborough.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:07, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

I think we can ignore this, as I think the bot is malfunctioning. It has fair use rationale the day the image was uploaded. I think the bot only searches for the keyword "non-free use" but not "fair use", which have the same meaning. OhanaUnitedTalk page 21:32, 26 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Notable or Notorious?

I would not call Paul Bernardo "notable", nor would I apply that to Robert Baltovich. Bernardo is NOTORIOUS. Baltovich is a victim of Bernardo but still not notable.Freiherrin (talk) 23:04, 14 January 2008 (UTC)