Talk:University of Toronto Faculty of Law
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada and related WikiProjects, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on Canada-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project member page, to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. |
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. |
 |
|
 |
[edit] JD program
Here is the link for U of T's JD program, in case you don't believe me: [1] Darkcore 19:50, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
[edit] Considered to be the best?
"The University of Toronto Law school is considered to be among the best in Canada, especially in corporate law and legal theory," -- Do we have a source for this? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.137.105.18 (talk • contribs) on 11:57, 16 April 2006.
[edit] Linking academic dishonesty incident
why is it that everytime i put up accurate and linked information about U of T law that is not favorable to them ie 25 of their students being disciplined by the Law Society of Upper Canada, that it is removed the next day? Is that how Wikipedia works???? If it can't put the truth except as accepted by the uoft mafia then wikipedia is a sad joke on us all.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cyril2006 (talk • contribs) on 15:54, 27 March 2007.
- You should try to present the information in an acceptable, formatted manner. Stuffing info in the middle of nowhere with absolute no formatting, grammatical checks whatsoever, is not how wikipedia works. Chensiyuan 20:27, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
No problem, although i am not convinced that that is the reason the links and information were repeatedly removed. You know what else is not how wiki is supposed to work? Total deletion of content you from U of T don't like. If it's not formatted or you think it should be in a different paragraph why don't you change it instead of just deleting it?? In fact, when i had first linked this information i had put it under the heading of "controversy" and it nevertheless entirely vanished the next day.
why did you delete it again? what is your rationale?
- who's "you"? i don't edit under anons. btw, i'm not from U of T either. Chensiyuan 03:04, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
You're quite a piece of work tough guy. do you think you're entitled to raze information on wikipedia just because i didn't sign properly??? why don't we have this arbitrated. Cyril2006Cyril2006 03:11, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- i have no idea what you're talking about. regarding arbitration, what is there to arbitrate over? Chensiyuan 03:15, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
I guess i will just keep adding the information that i have added several times and that has been removed several times including by you. We'll just keep doing this forever. I'll check back now and then and just change it. And in the meantime explain to everyone i know that wikipedia is a sorry joke thanks to the sad likes of you. And of course, you have no idea what i'm talking about. Cyril2006Cyril2006 08:18, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- yup you're a true asset. Chensiyuan (talk) 00:50, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
