From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
This article is part of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, which collaborates on Native American, First Nations, Inuit, Métis and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
Stub |
This article has been rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale. |
Suggested article edit guidelines:
- To help us prioritise our workload, and in readiness for Wikipedia:1.0, we need to assess our articles for Quality. If this article is Unassessed, please assess it. See the Article Classification for instructions. If you disagree with a rating, you can change it or discuss it at Article Classification.
- Before assessing this article, be sure to check the existing Archive of assessments made under the previous system (used until July 2006), and feel free to help in migrating the existing comments besides from adding your own evaluation.
- After assessing this article's quality, please make sure it to add it to the Lists at Article Classification, following the grading scheme detailed there.
|
This article has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it needs.
|
[edit] Merge into a UT article
There is so little information, and so little likelihood of adding additional information, about this mound that I think it does not merit its own article. Moreover, there's nothing here that suggests that the mound is exceptionally notable. I think it would be better to merge it into an article about the UT campus... --orlady 23:56, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- I agree. The location is kept secret, and this article is not likely to be expanded. --Baxterguy 16:10, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
- I respectfully disagree. This site is more than likely written up in archaeological journals. And information about it is most certainly contained in the NRHP nomination. Just because the location is restricted does not diminish its natability.Einbierbitte 17:47, 22 June 2007 (UTC)