Talk:University of Tennessee Agriculture Farm Mound

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

University of Tennessee Agriculture Farm Mound is within the scope of WikiProject Tennessee, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of Tennessee and related subjects in the Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, and even become a member.
[Watch Project Articles][Project Page][Project Talk][Template Usage]
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the Project's importance scale.
Please explain ratings on the ratings summary page.

This article is within the scope of the National Register of Historic Places WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of listings on the U.S. National Register of Historic Places.

Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale.
This article is part of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, which collaborates on Native American, First Nations, Inuit, Métis and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale.

This article has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it needs.

[edit] Merge into a UT article

There is so little information, and so little likelihood of adding additional information, about this mound that I think it does not merit its own article. Moreover, there's nothing here that suggests that the mound is exceptionally notable. I think it would be better to merge it into an article about the UT campus... --orlady 23:56, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

I agree. The location is kept secret, and this article is not likely to be expanded. --Baxterguy 16:10, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
I respectfully disagree. This site is more than likely written up in archaeological journals. And information about it is most certainly contained in the NRHP nomination. Just because the location is restricted does not diminish its natability.Einbierbitte 17:47, 22 June 2007 (UTC)