Talk:University of San Francisco

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Catholicism Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, which collaborates on articles related to the Roman Catholic Church. To participate, edit this article or visit the project page for details.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as low-importance on the Project's importance scale.

	This article is part of WikiProject California, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.

	This article is within the scope of the San Francisco Bay Area WikiProject, a collaborative effort to build a more detailed guide on Wikipedia's coverage of San Francisco and the Bay Area. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
B	This article has been rated as B-class on the quality scale.
High	This article has been rated as high-importance on the importance scale.

USF's mascot is the Don. What is a Don? The link under Miscellany doesn't help very much. SenorAnderson 06:14, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Nevermind [1]. SenorAnderson 17:54, 10 May 2005 (UTC)

Removed Incorrect's additions. Incorrect was referring to the incorrect school.--Annoyedgrunt 23:23, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Incorrect is so embarrassed, he has removed his incorrect comments about USF.Incorrect 07:41, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Does anybody know anything about the academic standards of this institution? A recent graduate of its MBA mentioned that they taught him subjects such as letter writing, excel spreadsheets,finacial spreadsheets as full time subjects and that exams consists of 30 min multiple choice tick box questions. He also had no idea of the more conventional subjects taught at schools elsewhere.

US News and World Report's 2007 Best Colleges rankings had USF at #112 for national universities. Washington Monthly has it at #95. 67.114.136.21 18:06, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

USF can't be THAT bad then, that narrows it down to the MBA or the student himeslf, I could not believe it when he told me what he did with a perfectly straight face.

USF's MBA has gotten some fairly decent rankings over the years as well (for example, the Wall Street Journal ranked USF's program among the top 100 in 2004 and the Princeton Review ranked it among the top 143 in 2005). But rankings don't necessarily translate into a stellar student experience for everybody. If the student in question had such a miserable time, he should have just transferred. 67.114.136.21

I seem to have upset somebody, let me just say, I have nothing against USF or its MBA, in fact I know little about either. The student in question was not upset about his USF MBA, in fact he was trying to get employment with it. I was simply suprised by what he told me. Needless to say, telling me that excel class was what he most enjoyed at USF while glossing over his ignorance of Supply Chain Mangement did little to advance his cause. I was simply intrigued how USF could turn out such a low calibre graduate. Which is what made me try to find a little more info on USF.

USF alum here. I can vouch that not everybody who graduated from USF had any business being there in the first place. Annoyedgrunt 03:01, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Userbox

A userbox has been created for USF alums amongst the Wikipedian hordes. The userpage code is: {{User_usfca}} --Dynaflow 12:46, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Rozelle on SI.jpg

Image:Rozelle on SI.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 19:56, 24 October 2007 (UTC)