Talk:University of Portsmouth
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Universities, an attempt to standardise coverage of universities and colleges. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion. |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. |
Contents |
[edit] MEDIA CHANGE
Hey guys, just thought I'd point out that as of this year Portsmouth has a fortnightly newspaper called Pugwash News, of which four pages are the Purple Wednesdays sports and societies section, instead of just Purple Wenesdays Mag as it says here. Its a new set up, which we hope will work! We still have the Pugwash Mag as well, which comes out about five times a year.--148.197.115.149 00:03, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] notable academics
I don't think we need to get into that game, because quite frankly it always winds up with a bunch of randoms who happen to be people's favourite lecturers getting added. If a case can be made for notability- i.e. prodigious research output in top journals (e.g. Nature, Science etc), or elected fellowship of learned societies (e.g. Royal Soc, British Academy, US Academy of Sciences etc) or they are notable for their public outreach work, e.g. as science writers or commentators on national events, then a case could be made for putting them in. With the best will in the world, this is unlikely to extend to a physicist whose papers are 'admittedly of marginal impact'! I have reverted for now, comments appreciated. Badgerpatrol 23:05, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] University ratings
(I'm posting this to all articles on UK universities as so far discussion hasn't really taken off on Wikipedia:WikiProject Universities.)
There needs to be a broader convention about which university rankings to include in articles. Currently it seems most pages are listing primarily those that show the institution at its best (or worst in a few cases). See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Universities#University ratings. Timrollpickering 23:20, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Motto
I note that someone has asked for a citation for the stated motto. There are in fact two probable problems. I have fixed the first, but left the second to others to research and debate.
The first is that the motto is stated as "lucem sequamiir". This is an underwstandable mistranscription. The "u"s in the motto as printed are difficult to tell from "ii" (a double "i"), but if this were the case it would be "liicem seqiimiir", which is celarly wrong. In fact my rather rusty Latin tells me that "lucem sequamur" means something like "We might follow the light". I have therefore changed "sequamiir" to "sequamur".
The second issue is that the motto went with the crest used when the establishment was Portsmouth Polytechnic. I can find no current use of the crest or motto, in which case it may be appropriate to remove it from the box, and possibly add it to the text under a section regarding the establishment's former guises. Since I have not been able to confirm that the motto is no longer in use, I have not acted on this, but leave it to others. SMeeds 13:56, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, I also think it was not spelt correctly as originally put. The city's coat of arms includes the motto "Heaven's light our guide", presumably a reference to maritime navigation, which is obviously somewhat similiar. I can't however find any reference to this being used as the University motto either (I can't remember what the polytechnic's badge looked like!). if no-one's been able to find a cite in the next few days then I'll remove it entirely. Badgerpatrol 01:23, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
I believe the coat of arms you refer to is still used but not frequently. Sporting equipment and my grad certificate (issued this year) have the old coat on it, i haven't really looked in detail for the motto and the certs at my grandparents house, but will check when next there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.135.2.161 (talk) 16:10, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Notable Alumni
I removed excessive detail as follows. Maybe a separate entry needs to be created for this individual if he/she is considered notable. If not, then he/she should be deleted from here. I note Badgerpatrol's comment at the top of this page on notable academics and will contact him.
Removed content (and a bit of context):
- Dr. El Amine Lehtihet - Professor and widely published author - [[Dr. Lehtihet is Associate Professor of Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering at Penn State. He holds a B.Sc. in Mechanical Engineering and M.S. and Ph.D. Degrees in Industrial Engineering. His teaching and research interests include the geometric analysis of mechanical assemblies, tolerance control and synthesis of mechanical products, machining theory and practice, tolerance control in machining, process planning and metrology. He has published over 40 technical papers on tolerancing related topics and machining. He served as a consultant on tolerancing in design and machining related issues to a number of companies such as AT&T Reading Works, United Defense / BMY Combat Systems, Burle Industries, Cannondale Corp., Alpha Sintered Metals, NAC Carbon, Sensus Technologies, C-COR Electronics and ECHO Ultrasound.]]
SMeeds 09:49, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:University of Portsmouth.jpg
Image:University of Portsmouth.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 02:45, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
