Talk:University of Belgrano

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is part of WikiProject Argentina, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles related to Argentina. For guidelines see the project page and Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the University of Belgrano article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

The poor quality of the institution is an issue that should be in the article.--PortoPuto 22:26, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

Regardless of the alleged university quality, Wikipedia is NOT the best place to include that kind of statements. Also your username can be considered offensive, so please change it or you'll blocked. --COA 22:34, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

I think that it should be written in the article.

By the way, I've changed my username as you requested. --PortoPuto 22:40, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

Are you kidding? Your username looks exactly the same. This is your last warning. Please stop vandalizing or you'll be blocked. --COA 22:54, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --COA 23:14, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Quality discussion

Just saying the quality is bad, or "some people say that" is a opinion, and uncited and unverifable opinions are discouraged. However, if you can find a source that describes the universtiy in this way, then that's fine. The difference is between

• "Some people say X is bad" - claim has no source, can't be verified - and see Wikipedia:Avoid weasel words
• "Paper X[link] described X as bad" - verifible, source is cited and named.

Hope that helps. MartinRe 00:15, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User request

(Message added here, in case user has dynamic ip) When the blocked user returns, please read the disucssions on this page as to why your recent edits were regarded as unhelpful. It would also be useful to read the wikipedia rules (summary at WP:SR, especially the part on being neutral WP:NPOV as the claims you made were examples of so-called weasal words: Wikipedia:Avoid weasel words ) Cheers. MartinRe 11:35, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Please read this before editing the article

Recent vandalism in this article has been unstoppable, please discuss changes here before editing the article. All edits with no consensus will be considered vandalism and removed without any advise. Thanks. --OneEuropeanHeart 22:16, 21 February 2006 (UTC)