Talk:United States presidential election, 1884

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the United States presidential elections WikiProject. This project provides a central approach to United States presidential elections-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

Contents

[edit] Did Arthur run or not

This article said that Arthur did not seek the Republican nomination, yet in his own article it said that he did run but lost to Blaine. So which is it? Also this article said that he would have won the nomination had he ran. Really, the impression I got was that Arthur did not have sufficient support to win the nomination.--The Shadow Treasurer 04:31, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

To-do list for United States presidential election, 1884:
  • Mention "Rum, Romanism, and Rebellion" (Samuel Burchard)

Please see Wikipedia:Style for U.S. presidential election, yyyy for standards for all "U.S. presidential election, yyyy" pages.

[edit] Arthur and the Republican Convention of 1884

Results of the first ballot, Republican National Convention: Blaine 334.5; Arthur 278; Edmunds 93; others 114.5.

Fourth ballot: Blaine 541; Arthur 207; Edmunds 41; scattering 31.

See http://www.ourcampaigns.com/RaceDetail.html?RaceID=57960

Chronicler3 03:03, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Electoral College votes cast for Belva Ann Lockwood?

I'd posted this query here: Talk:Faithless_elector#Faithless_electors_in_1884?. In short, Lockwood evidently claimed that Indiana's electoral college votes were cast for her. Esquizombi 03:05, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] More information on the Belva Ann Lockwood vote

It is not clear how many votes Lockwood received. She claimed to have received 4,149 votes, which appears to be the total nationwide scattering vote.

However, that number has some complications. In Ohio, the state board of canvassers certified 369 scattering votes, some of which were for Lockwood but not all. The Lockwood vote was not specified. Ohio State Journal, 11/17/1884.

The Raleigh [NC] News reported that Lockwood received two votes in Texas, but the official vote does not mention them.

The Fayetteville [NC] Observer reported on 11/20/1884 that Lockwood received 50 votes in New York State. The New York Times in different stories accounts for two of these votes (11/7/1884, 11/13/1884).

Miscellaneous votes for Lockwood were mentioned in the New York Times - but not officially recorded - as three in Pennsylvania (NYT 11/23/1884), one in West Virginia (NYT 11/25/1884), and one in Illinois (11/20/1884).

What all this adds up to is that the Lockwood vote cannot easily reach the 4,149 total often reported. If someone were able to track down all scattering votes, it seems likely that Lockwood received around 200.

Although it is reported that the Indiana Electors gave their state's electoral vote to Lockwood, I have not been able to find any evidence this took place. I have looked in newspaper accounts, and none mention such an event. Also, when the joint session of Congress assembled to count the votes, the only thing mentioned as out of the ordinary was that the certificate of vote from Maryland was mis-read. Chronicler3 01:10, 1 May 2007 (UTC)