Talk:United States Supreme Court building

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is supported by the District of Columbia WikiProject.

This project provides a central approach to District of Columbia-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

Demataion of this article calls for deletion or revision or protection by t he editors.

[edit] Architecture

Something about the Architecture, the inspirations and the like would be a nice addition to the article, and very approproiate given the article is about the building itself and not the institution as a whole... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.45.15.153 (talk) 12:21, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Courtroom Frieze

Per YHoshua's edit, I do think this deserves some discussion here, expecially in light of the continuing atheist crusade to rid America of references to religious faith. However, I can't vouch for the accuracy of the information currently there, and I think that - suitably expanded - it belongs in the main section (or a subsection thereof), rather than under misc. Simon Dodd 19:34, 20 December 2005 (UTC)



The notes on the Muhammad debacle is a quote from

http://www.gazettetimes.com/articles/2006/02/11/news/religion/satrel04.txt

MX44 01:42, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Why I put back in the photos that were here before Wikibophop's edits

A certain user took out my photo and that of another person several weeks ago and unilaterally replaced them with his/her own. I was too busy with lawyer stuff at the time to catch it. I am reverting that now because (1) the quality of the new photos was terrible; (2) there was no captions or detail offered, increasing the chance that the photos were probably copied off of an existing Web site; and (3) the user failed to properly warn anyone of the proposed deletion in advance. --Coolcaesar 09:23, 15 November 2006 (UTC)