Talk:Unión Espiritista Cristiana de Filipinas, Inc.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Unión Espiritista Cristiana de Filipinas, Inc. article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	This article is within the scope of Tambayan Philippines, the WikiProject and notice board for topics related to the Philippines. To participate, visit the Tambayan for more information.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

[edit] irrelevance of the Information

I just discovered this article after spending some time to work on the Center of Tagumpay ng Katotohanan article (which had a bad link to this article). Both these articles need work on the citations and an effort needs to be made to organize them better.Vontrotta 21:50, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

this own made principles of Ben San Juan were neither approved nor accepted by UECFI board true seekers of truth will know the truth. Allankardec (talk) 22:38, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Request for Help

It is in deed an honor that the articles were given time and read its deficiencies;

As a new "could- be" contributor, I am very much willing to submit my self to your advices and guidelines, and learn how to prepare relevant articles for your consideration.

The way I look at it, there are lot of things to improve in writing an article especially to this prestigious Wikipedia, thus please help me on what and how to improve the article and give me time to be able to cope up with your standards.

Respectfully yours

(bensj 04:13, 17 December 2007 (UTC))

As you will see, I have started to edit this article. My first steps were to simplify the intro, start reformatting the citations and simplifying the fonts. If you want to help, please change the rest of the citations using the format I introduced. If it is confusing to you, just leave it. Once I have completed the reformatting, I will do some major edits to change the article from something you would use with your members to a summary that is suitable for an encyclopedia article. The result will be a much shorter article.Vontrotta (talk) 13:13, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Alright, I finished reorganizing the cites, but, on closer examination, I am not sure the match the text very well. I also continued to simplify the formatting and organization, at least to a degree where I think I understand what is trying to be expresses. The next step, and the one that will involve some major cuts in the text, will be to try to change it into an encyclopedia article.Vontrotta (talk) 11:50, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

I' m trying to catch up to your stlye, please accept my great appreciation.

Thank you.

Espiritista (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 08:56, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Thank You

Thank you for revising your work brother Allankardec (talk) 01:23, 24 May 2008 (UTC)