Category talk:United States Navy Minnesota-related ships

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This category was nominated for deletion, renaming, or merging with another category on 2006 December 27. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Category:United States Navy Minnesota-related ships page.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming

This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:

Minnesota WikiProject      (Rated Category-Class) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, which aims to improve all articles related to Minnesota. Category This article has been rated as Category-Class on the assessment scale. Low This article is on a subject of Low-importance within Minnesota articles. Military history WikiProject This non-article page is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions. NA Non-article pages do not require a rating on the quality scale. Additional information and associated task forces: Associated task forces (general topics): Maritime warfare task force Associated task forces (nations and regions): United States military history task force WikiProject Ships (Rated Category-Class) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Ship-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome. Category rated as Category-Class on the assessment scale NA rated as NA-importance on the assessment scale

[edit] Delete discussion

[edit] Support

[edit] Oppose

I strongly oppose. This was no consensus last week, so now it is brought back on the table. I believe this is a very good category. --JAYMEDINC 18:14, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Speedy Keep. This is a good category and editors are working to expand entries. --71Demon 15:00, 5 January 2007 (UTC)