Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contract Law
Part of the common law series
Contract
Contract formation
Offer and acceptance  · Mailbox rule
Mirror image rule  · Invitation to treat
Firm offer  · Consideration
Defenses against formation
Lack of capacity to contract
Duress  · Undue influence
Illusory promise  · Statute of frauds
Non est factum
Contract interpretation
Parol evidence rule
Contract of adhesion
Integration clause
Contra proferentem
Excuses for non-performance
Mistake  · Misrepresentation
Frustration of purpose  · Impossibility
Impracticability  · Illegality
Unclean hands  · Unconscionability
Accord and satisfaction
Rights of third parties
Privity of contract
Assignment  · Delegation
Novation  · Third party beneficiary
Breach of contract
Anticipatory repudiation  · Cover
Exclusion clause  · Efficient breach
Fundamental breach
Remedies
Specific performance
Liquidated damages
Penal damages  · Rescission
Quasi-contractual obligations
Promissory estoppel
Quantum meruit
Subsets: Conflict of law
Commercial law
Other areas of the common law
Tort law  · Property law
Wills and trusts
Criminal law  · Evidence

The Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999, SI 1999/2083, incorporates[1] Directive 93/13/EC[2] into law of the United Kingdom. Repeals The Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1994.

Contents

[edit] Overview

These Regulations overlap somewhat with the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 which deals specifically with exemption clauses. The Directive set out requirements that in many ways are narrower than rules already in place in English law. It does, however, extend the scope of terms which can be rendered ineffective; especially when dealing with unfair terms that do not constitute exemption clauses. It also has provisions specifically for standard form contract.

The regulations only work to render ineffective terms that benefit seller or suppliers, in the favour of consumers.

[edit] Definition of Unfair

Regulation 5(1)[3] sets defines the principle of unfair.

  • Has not been individually negotiated [4]
  • Causes significant imbalance in the parties rights and obligations.
  • Contrary to the requirement of good faith.

"Has not been individually negotiated" encompasses terms of which the consumer has not had the opportunity to mould. Terms that have been individually negotiated are outside this regulation, the contract however, and other terms, may be.[5]

"Causes significant imbalance". This requires the term to be to the detriment of the consumer and benefit the seller or supplier to an excessive degree.

"Contrary to good faith". In the complex case of Director General of Fair Trading v First National Bank[6], the bank's seemingly unfair interest term was found to be in good faith as the term guarded the bank from a possible situation of receiving no interest defeating their business objective.

Schedule 2 sets out an indicative, non-exhaustive list of terms that would be unfair.

[edit] Effect of Unfair Term

Regulation 8 provides that an unfair term "shall not be binding upon the consumer".

[edit] See also

[edit] External links

[edit] References

  1. ^ Enacted persuant to European Communities Act 1972
  2. ^ (1993) L95 OJ 29
  3. ^ "A contractual term which has not been individually negotiated shall be regarded as unfair if, contrary to the requirement of good faith, it causes a significant imbalance in the parties' rights and obligations arising under the contract, to the detriment of the consumer"
  4. ^ Regulation 5(2)
  5. ^ Regulation 8(2)
  6. ^ [2001] 3 WLR 1297