From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This IP address has been blocked temporarily.
Suspected sockpuppet evidence has determined that this IP address is being used abusively;
the address has been blocked to prevent further abuse.
If you are a registered user and are seeing this message, please post {{unblock|reason for unblock here}} on your talk page, with a note
referencing this message. Please be sure to include the IP address (which should appear at the bottom of the block message).
Administrators: Please consult with the blocking administrator who placed the block before unblocking. |
Daniel Case 12:41, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "What if I come back in a different account, and I edit constructively, and become a sysop, and contribute heavily to FA's. Then, you discover that the account you once thought to be a good user is in fact a banned user. You would immediately desyssop me like I'm still the same old sockpuppeteer, like I haven't changed. Trees don't remain the same stature forever- they grow. And though they are the same tree, they become different. All I ask is for one more chance. After this, protect all my other talk pages please."
Decline reason: "The reason this requests takes time is that we find it hard to assume good faith after someone used 15 accounts to evade a block. If you wish to request unblock, please appeal to the Arbitration Comitee (by sending an e-mail to one of the active members) — -- lucasbfr talk 09:53, 4 September 2007 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
I understand the reasoning behind what you say, and frankly, I think I'd like to appeal. However,I doubt I'd have anybody support me- in fact, I think that it'll be a WP:200-breaking opposition to me having my ban lifted, as the community hates me. The arbitration commitee is quite strict in terms of dealings with guys like me, and the last time I used an alternate vandalism account, it was out of anger because a few influential administrators were calling my new account incredibly disruptive. It was made out of vengeance, and I'd like to appeal, but I fear the commitee will reject it on sight. But I guess it's worth a shot if they can listen to my argument. I'll use my original account to email the arbitration commitee, who'll likely support my block. But I'll try, I'll try. Underneath the bridge 10:04, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
How d'you E-mail the arbitration commitee? Underneath the bridge 10:12, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Just click the "email" link near one of the members name. -- lucasbfr talk 12:07, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "I would like to appeal my ban at the arbitration commitee, and my e-mail isn't working (they delete it on sight without even reading it)."
Decline reason: "No, Connell. This isn't being overturned, given the Arbitration Committee apparently doesn't wish to hear your appeal (as they "delete it on sight"). Daniel 11:51, 9 September 2007 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
