Talk:Undisputed Attitude

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good article Undisputed Attitude has been listed as one of the Arts good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
December 26, 2007 Good article nominee Listed
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

The following comments were left by the quality and importance raters: (edit · refresh)

Undisputed Attitude, EASILY the best Slayer release that EVER came out!!! I really wonder why it got such a bad review, now I admit people wanted to hear Slayer, but it's nice to see they pay tribute to songs they originally cut there teeth on, so to speak. I actually liked this CD, such intensity, thumbs up!!!! 24.68.131.208 03:28, 26 April 2007 (UTC)_Griphin_

This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Slayer, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Slayer. If you would like to participate please visit the project page.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale.
Heavy metal Portal
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, an attempt to improve articles related to heavy metal music. Please participate by visiting the project page for more details on the projects.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

The following comments were left by the quality and importance raters: (edit · refresh)

Undisputed Attitude, EASILY the best Slayer release that EVER came out!!! I really wonder why it got such a bad review, now I admit people wanted to hear Slayer, but it's nice to see they pay tribute to songs they originally cut there teeth on, so to speak. I actually liked this CD, such intensity, thumbs up!!!! 24.68.131.208 03:28, 26 April 2007 (UTC)_Griphin_

[edit] Kurt Cobain's brain? WTF?

"A rumor about the album is that there is a photo of Kurt Cobain's brain in the artwork" Can someone explain this? --Dexter prog 16:40, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Dead reference

SlayerSaves.com reference is dead. Gocsa 12:51, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

I've used the Internet Archive to address this, so the reference now uses the archived version of the page. LuciferMorgan (talk) 11:45, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] GA nomination on hold

  • "and three original songs by the thrash metal band Slayer" - "the" not necessary
I've removed "the". LuciferMorgan (talk) 16:33, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
  • "The album received generally negative reviews; " - you quote 2 reviews here and the 2nd seems positive
Fixed. LuciferMorgan (talk) 16:43, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
  • I think you need a more specific URL than [1] - I can't find the one you're citing by the look of it...
I added "Part 1 and 2" to the title so the reader knows which interview it is, i did this otherwise it would open windows media player with a direct link M3tal H3ad (talk) 03:11, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
  • [2] - Professional review, add to infobox?
I've added the review to the infobox. LuciferMorgan (talk) 16:36, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
  • AMG/RS have to be in italics in the infobox
They're now in italics. LuciferMorgan (talk) 16:37, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

That be all. — Dihydrogen Monoxide (Review) 04:20, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Aaand passed. — Dihydrogen Monoxide (Review) 09:14, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
Nice work! --kingboyk (talk) 14:50, 28 December 2007 (UTC)