Talk:Underworld (DeLillo novel)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is not written in a formal tone. It also should be expanded.
Contents |
[edit] In the middle...
of reading this and will try to add to this article after I have completed it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.20.191.54 (talk) 14:15, 17 December 2006 (UTC).
Is it really important to note that the Brooklyn Dodgers are now the Los Angeles Dodgers, and the New York Giants are now in San Fransisco? It was a pennant race between the Brooklyn Dodgers and the New York Giants-- where they moved after is not at all relevant to this story. "The National League pennant race of 1951 belongs to the ages. There has been nothing like it before or since. Nor will it come again. Summarizing the 1951 race is akin to summarizing King Lear. Before anything else, your effort will diminish majesty." - Roger Kahn, The Era.
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Underworld.jpeg
Image:Underworld.jpeg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 02:27, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Major Overhaul
I just finished reading this novel and thought I could add some more information to the article. Everything that was there before is still in the article, I just tried to add more information on characters, criticism, awards, etc. I really struggled with how to describe the characters and plot and how much information to provide. I know the spoiler tag is out of vogue, but not using it makes me hesitant to reveal big plot elements. Anyway, since it was such a large change, I thought I should post something about it here. I'm hoping maybe other editors can step in and fill it out some more. - Skinny McGee 04:05, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Lead discussion
Looking at this talk, I'm not sure how much traffic this page is getting, but none-the-less, I'll bring this up on the talk. The lead places some heavy emphasis on the NY Times book review and it's ranking of this book. I removed one of two sentences, but I was considering moving this ranking from the lead and putting somewhere else in the article. Thoughts? Gwynand | Talk•Contribs 03:01, 25 May 2008 (UTC)