User:Uncle.bungle
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
New job, new city, will bbl
Wikipedia, where books rewrite themselves
"Some people say"... {{who?}}
[edit] Quotes from editors
There are certain editors who seem to have a monopoly on interpretation of Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Their words are extremely valuable when attempting to diffuse situations.
[edit] Humus Sapiens
- A testimony from a participant is important. The source itself does not need to be NPOV (especially about their own past), but our coverage should be. BTW, I am sure we can find additional sources about the Hunting Season and we need an article on that campaign. Humus sapiens ну 02:25, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[1]
[edit] Jayjg
- ... or do our own analysis of the veracity of comments made in reliable sources based on their use of "primary sources", we simply repeat what reliable sources have said.[2]
- Labelled? By who? When? This will never be anything other than a battleground. It amounts to a POV fork of the State Terrorism articles that already exist and we don't need another front in these fights. It'll always be a POV magnet for edit warriors already active in other areas of Wikipedia. [3]
- The Jewish Virtual Library is considered a partisan source here - I'm afraid you'll have to hit the real history books... [4]
- The Jewish Virtual Library was established in 1993 as a nonprofit 501(c)(3), nonpartisan organization. It has a public Board of Directors. The authors of its articles are known, as is its executive director, Mitchell Bard. I'm not sure what you're objecting to. Jayjg (talk) 03:54, 4 January 2007 (UTC) [5]
