From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indian cinema, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Indian cinema. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. |
|
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. |
Stub |
This article has been rated as stub-Class on the quality scale. (add comments) |
More information about this article...
|
|
|
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
|
Editing Guidelines |
Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article:
- If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film)
- When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot summary of no more than 900 words, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references.
- Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film.
|
|
Article upgrading needed: You can help! |
WP:IA |
Stub to Start-Class Upgrading Instructions for Films
- Note that instructions for articles on other types of film topics within the scope of WikiProject Films are currently under development.
To contribute in upgrading this stub article to Start class, the following requirements must be met:
- Significant intro (list the title, alternate titles, year released, director, actors starring in the film, summary of headings, etc.)
- Film infobox ({{infobox film}})
- Picture: Consult WikiProject Free Images for freely released images from a film shoot, opening, or other relevant free image. Non-free and unlicensed images are to be avoided if at all possible, but if used should include a detailed fair use rationale. (An image is not required for start class if unavailable.)
- Plot summary
- Include cast and crew information.
- At least two other developed sections of information (production, reception (including box office figures), awards and honors, themes, differences from novel or TV show, soundtrack, sequels, DVD release, etc.)
- Categories (by year, country, language, and genre(s))
Helpful links: WP:BETTER, WP:LEAD, WP:REF, WP:WAF
Once this article has fulfilled these requirements, the film can be reassessed to Start class and this template will be removed automatically.
|
|
|
|
[edit] Anon's synopsis
Anon, I restored the old synopsis. It did leave out a great many plot details but ... it was readable. The purpose of a synopsis is to let a reader know if he or she might be interested in the film. No one wants to read about a movie he or she hasn't seen, IN DETAIL. It's like being backed into a corner by your boring uncle who insists on telling you every detail of his recent trip to Kolkata. I don't want to discourage you from working on Indian cinema -- there are so many movies, and actors, and music directors, etc., who deserve articles, or better articles -- but just be careful with the synopses. Assume that all your readers have three minute attention spans -- as indeed they might :) Zora 05:37, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Anon, PLEASE
Anon, that long synopsis is of interest to no one but yourself. Consider: if you haven't seen the movie, hearing all the plot details is boring. If you have seen the movie, you don't need the details. They're BORING.
A synopsis must be short and readable. Its main use is for the encyclopedia user who is trying to decide whether or not to rent a film, or perhaps for someone who just wants to get a notion of what kind of films Rekha made. Extreme detail in the synopsis just makes it hard to read. Zora 08:06, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Incorrect link to Khayyam
The link under the awards and recognitions section should be to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammed_Zahur_Khayyam, and not to Omar Khayyam.
Shobhan (shobhand@gmail.com) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.26.47.114 (talk) 04:13, 17 February 2008 (UTC)