Talk:Umar at Fatimah's house
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
What more context is needed? --Striver 22:26, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
- Let me tell you what is needed.... Sunni sources and a presentation of the Sunni view :) Hamid-Masri 22:11, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] neutrality
al-islam.org is not a reliable source, and a number of polemical exchanges (i.e. peshawar nights) are being used as sources for this article, which is not appropriate. i don't think this topic merits an article on its own, IMO it should be redirected back to a parent article which discusses this incident in a section and simultaneously in the wider context of its significance to particular disputes. ITAQALLAH 22:24, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
This page should be deleted. Not a single piece of legitimate evidence is provided to back up these claims. The only source is a Shia which actively promotes the Shia religions. It does not pass the Neutrality test. --quizling22204 11/29/2007.
- There is a more NPOV and verifiable version in the main article. I copy it in the lead.--Seyyed(t-c) 02:57, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
- In addition al-Islam.org usually gathers other sources and we can't say it's reliable or not. We should check the reliability of the author of that text. For example it gathers a book of "Allame Fadlullah" [1] and it's a reliable source to represent Shia POV.--Seyyed(t-c) 03:07, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Article re-written: Non-Neutral Sources have been deleted
I have re-written the article with direct quotes from the earliest historical works i.e. Tabari, Masoudi, and Yaqubi. This article is no longer polemical in nature as Shia sources are provided under a separate heading. Mhaider5 (talk) 21:18, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
