Talk:Ulyanovskaya Mine disaster

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ulyanovskaya Mine disaster article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	Russia Portal This page is within the scope of WikiProject Russia. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.
Stub	This article has been rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the assessment scale.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

A story relating to the article Ulyanovskaya Mine disaster (or a previous version of it) was included in the news section of the Energy Portal. Please consider updating the portal news with any major developments on this topic.

The English used in this article is terrible. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.173.2.6 (talk • contribs)

Reply to above: Oh okay. What have you been doing? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.234.140.165 (talk • contribs)

How's that? I re-worded most of the article... reads much cleaner now. Of course, for future reference, you can edit articles yourself... Bushytails 18:54, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

The English is perfectly fine. I don't see how 62.173.2.6 could think otherwise. Nishkid64 20:04, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

I agree. This was the version when 62.173... replied. The only real English problem I could see was the quote. Even that was perfectly understandable even if a bit strangely worded [1] Nil Einne 07:22, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Manufacturer of Equipment?

Who was the English manufacturer of the safety equipment? I can't seem to find a name in any online reports. Would that be a relevant detail for this article or not? DanBeale 11:40, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

It's not totally useful, but if you cold find it, you can surely add it to the article. Nishkid64 20:03, 21 March 2007 (UTC)