User talk:Ultrasolvent
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Welcome to the Wikipedia!
Welcome to the Wikipedia, Ultrasolvent! And thanks for fixing the typo over on the Autistic enterocolitis article. Hope you enjoy editing here and becoming a Wikipedian! Here are a few perfunctory tips to hasten your acculturation into the Wikipedia experience:
- Take a look at the Wikipedia Tutorial and Manual of Style.
- When you have time, you can peruse The five pillars of Wikipedia, and assume good faith, but keep in mind the unique style you brought to the Wiki!
- Always keep the notion of NPOV in mind, be respectful of others' POV, and remember your unique perspective on the meaning of neutrality is invaluable!
- If you need any help, post your question at the Help Desk.
- Explore, be bold in editing, and, above all else, have fun!
And some odds and ends: Boilerplate text, Brilliant prose, Cite your sources, Civility, Conflict resolution, How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Pages needing attention, Peer review, Policy Library, Utilities, Verifiability, Village pump, Wikiquette, and you can sign your name on any page by typing 4 tildes: ~~~~.
Best of luck, Ultrasolvent, and have fun! Ombudsman 01:32, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] AFD
Help save Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of relationships with age disparity
[edit] SummerSlam
Thank you for your contribution to the article SummerSlam. Unfortunantly, we have move the content you re-posted to another sub-page located at SummerSlam (1988). I have removed the section you posted since it was an exact duplicate of what was written on SummerSlam (1988). All SummerSlam pay per viewws are being moved to sub-pages like SummerSlam (1988), so until they are moved completely, please do not readd this content. Thank you! — The King of Kings 02:19, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] A request for assistance
Would you support the concept of moving the Earhart "myths" to a separate page or article? The reason for my suggesting this is that the main article should be an accurate and scholarly work while the speculation and conspiracy theories surrounding the disappearance of Amelia Earhart are interesting, they belong in a unique section. Most researchers, as you know, discount the many theories and speculation that has arisen in the years following her last flight. Go onto the Earhart discussion page and register your vote/comments...and a Happy New Year to you as well. Bzuk 05:52 3 January 2007 (UTC).
