User talk:Ultraexactzz
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Welcome to my User Talk page. I'll reply to any message you leave here on your talk page, unless you wish otherwise and say so. If I haven't answered you in a short time, it's possible that I am away from a computer at the moment - I assure you, I will get back to you. If you came here because of a deletion I performed, please make sure to note which article or image I deleted, as there's no way I can reply unless I know. Thanks again, UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence |  |
 Archives |
| Archive 1 – Archive 2 – Archive 3 |
[edit] New Project
Myself and several other editors have been compiling a list of very active editors who would likely be available to help new editors in the event they have questions or concerns. As the list grew and the table became more detailed, it was determined that the best way to complete the table was to ask each potential candidate to fill in their own information, if they so desire. This list is sorted geographically in order to provide a better estimate as to whether the listed editor is likely to be active.
If you consider yourself a very active Wikipedian who is willing to help newcomers, please either complete your information in the table or add your entry. If you do not want to be on the list, either remove your name or just disregard this message and your entry will be removed within 48 hours. The table can be found at User:Useight/Highly Active, as it has yet to have been moved into the Wikipedia namespace. Thank you for your help. Useight (talk) 04:43, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] User:10dellis
hi there, this user 10dellis is reverting my edits and keeps writing spam and vandalism on your userpage Christopher140691 (talk) 14:42, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
- No idea why this user is so wanting to vandalise an Admins page. Bit foolish if you ask me Christopher140691 (talk) 14:56, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
-
- No problem. Didn't know if you had seen it thats why I thought I would tell you. Thats a good response to a problem user. Bloced indef. Christopher140691 (talk) 15:26, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Treelo
I don't want to overstep, but in just the last 30-40 minutes, many of his/her reverts have been called into question. Is removal of rollback applicable at this point? At least until Treelo decides its time to discuss, maybe this will get his/her attention. SynergeticMaggot (talk) 13:34, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
- It appears Treelo has commented at the exact same time as I posted the above. Disregard at will :) SynergeticMaggot (talk) 13:37, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] User talk:Olaf750
Just thought you might be interested in this. Don't know why the IP thought your name was a good one to use. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 13:26, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
- No problem. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 20:47, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy means speedy
Thank you for your quick action. I found the page kind of horrifying. David in DC (talk) 20:57, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] F class
up to you, but I see from his talk page he's been given final warnings about this before. DGG (talk) 20:46, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for May 2nd and 9th, 2008.
 |
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 4, Issue 18 | 2 May 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
||
| Volume 4, Issue 19 | 9 May 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:58, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] The COOKIE MONSTER ate the cow
Fattyjwoods (Push my button) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Hi just to make sure you’re not too hungry, I would’ve given you milk – but the cow just died and I tried to milk the bull but it kicked me in the face. *sob*. Anyway, enjoy the cookie!! Fattyjwoods (Push my button) 01:42, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Page deleted
Hi, I wanted to let you know that there is a page that has been used to attack me here User:Omero Tognon. The person who made it has been asked to discontinue the accusations by administrators. My user page also had to be protected. I appreciate the deletion of Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Libro0. I was hoping that this page Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Libro0 could also be deleted on grounds it is an attack in which the user was told to cease. Libro0 (talk) 21:31, 11 May 2008 (UTC) Thank you. Libro0 (talk) 18:15, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
- Hi, sorry to bother you. It appears as though the attacker has struck again. The User:Box Benefits page has once again been tagged with my name. Would it be possible for this page and the one above to be removed? Libro0 (talk) 08:02, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Ꙏ
How was this patent nonsense? While admittedly I can't read cyrillic and don't have a font installed that displays this glyph, it looked like a perfectly comprehensible (if short) article, seemed consistent with both Ь and Ъ (which it linked to) and Cyrillic characters in Unicode (which links to it), and googles quite well, considering the obscure subject. —Cryptic 15:29, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Rfb participation thanks
Hello, Ultra.
I wanted to personally thank you for taking part in the project-wide discussions regarding my candidacy for bureaucratship. After bureaucratic discussion, the bureaucrats decided that there was sufficient significant and varied opposition to my candidacy, and thus no "Ultra-Exact" consensus to promote. Although personally disappointed, I both understand and respect their decision, especially in light of historical conservatism the project has had when selecting its bureaucrats. If you have any further suggestions or comments as to how you think I could help the project, please let me know. Once again, thank you for your both your early and strong support, and your continued advice. -- Avi (talk) 16:36, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] deletion of template talk page
Hi, Ultraexactzz. I may have goofed the request for speedy deletion of Template talk:South Dakota college football venues. Actually, that one was supposed to stay and Template talk:South Dakota College Football Venues was supposed to be deleted. Could you take a look at that? --Gwguffey (talk) 18:43, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Campus Outreach Opportunity League
You recently deleted an article that I was still in the middle of writing. Your comment stated that it looked like an advertisement. I was writing a historical record of a key national non-profit organization that existed for about 20 years. Since it no longer exists, it is definitely not an ad. I did not yet have a chance to add in references.
Here they are in case you want to check them first: http://www.learningtogive.org/papers/index.asp?bpid=181 http://www.bonner.org/about/WMeisel.htm http://www.wkkf.org/Default.aspx?tabid=97&CID=288&CatID=288&ItemID=2236&NID=96&LanguageID=0 http://servenet.org/Toolkit/Pages/OrganizationProfile/tabid/230/mygroupid/8/Default.aspx —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jsarvey (talk • contribs) 20:05, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] deletion of template talk page - part 2
The same thing happened with the request for speedy deletion of Template talk:South Carolina college football venues. The one was supposed to be deleted was Template talk:South Carolina College Football Venues. Could you fix that one, too? --Gwguffey (talk) 03:16, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks, Ultra. Sorry for making more work for you. I am done moving that set, but should I need to do something similar in the future, what would be the best way to help avoid that situation? Should I blank the talk page at the same time as requesting the G7 speedy on the article/template? --Gwguffey (talk) 03:31, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] WBOSITG's RfA
[edit] My RfA
Hi Ultraexactzz; I wanted to say thank you for supporting my request for adminship, which passed with 100 supports, 0 opposes and 1 neutral. I wanted to get round everybody individually, even though it's considered by some to be spam (which... I suppose it is! but anyway. :)). It means a lot to me that the community has placed its trust in my ability to use the extra buttons, and I only hope I can live up to its expectations. If you need anything, or notice something that bothers you, don't hesitate to let me know. Thanks again, PeterSymonds | talk 21:39, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Dr Spam (MD)
I suggest that you ask that user to verify that they are a doctor or ban them. Is there somewhere that I can complain about inappropriate usernames? Dr Spam is bad enough but the Dr Spam (MD) makes a claim of being a doctor. Worse yet, they have been disciplined for bad behavior. This brings disrepute to the medical profession.
On the other hand, I am seeking to have verification that I am a doctor so that people will know that I am not a convict or from a drug company. After I get that, then I plan to write something in Wikipedia. Doctor Wikipedian (talk) 16:45, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Lots of doctors have been disciplined for bad behaviour. The GMC employs full time staff for no other purpose. Sorry what's your point? Dr Spam (MD) (talk) 10:03, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for May 12th, 2008.
|
|
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 4, Issue 20 | 12 May 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 10:01, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] WP:HAU
Hello again. The Highly Active Users project has gone through a complete revamping per popular demand. We believe this new format will make it easier for new editors to find assistance. However, with the new format, I must again ask you to verify your information on this page. I attempted to translate the data from the old version to the new, but with the extensive changes, I may have made some errors. Thanks again. Useight (talk) 04:29, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] RFA Thanks
Thanks for your support at my recent Request for adminship. I hope you find I live up to your expectations. Best, Risker (talk) 15:44, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Lara's MFD
See my response to Equaczion. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 18:40, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] ANI
WP:ANI#User:LaraLove's controversial userbox. Equazcion •✗/C • 22:53, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Thank you
 |
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
| Your comment here was greatly appreciated. dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 00:13, 17 May 2008 (UTC) |
[edit] RfA thanks!
 |
RfA: Many thanks | |
| Many thanks for your participation in my recent request for adminship. I am impressed by the amount of thought that goes into people's contribution to the RfA process, and humbled that so many have chosen to trust me with this new responsibility. I step into this new role cautiously, but will do my very best to live up to your kind words and expectations, and to further the project of the encyclopedia. Again, thank you. --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 06:09, 18 May 2008 (UTC) |
[edit] geminate
couldn't you wait even 1 week before deleting "geminate recombination" ?
google "geminate recombination" to see how many scientific papers use this theory, yet wikipedia has no direct page on this kinetic theory.
i honestly think that you should have waited atleast a week before deleting, didn't you read what i wrote?
omermar @ 18/05/08. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Omermar (talk • contribs) 13:17, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] n-prize
Many thanks for your helpful comments and editing. Just one thing - I believe the neutrality of the article came into question because another administrator believed that I was the organiser (I actaully found out about it from "New Scientist"). Would it be OK to remove this tag now especially as you've been through the text?--Garf444 (talk) 15:39, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] You a serius adnim? This is seriuz bisnes
[1]. Does this qualify as a "shenanigan"? (I'll leave the joy of figuring the code out to yourself... =|:-) Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:41, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] User:Hashmi, Usman
I have been monitoring him for a couple of days and reverting several of his unhelpful edits and issued him several warnings. How is requesting CSD for meaningless pages unhelpful? I decided to CSD them when I saw that the pages they lead to are up for CSD. If they are deleted, the redirect pages would be orphans. I deleted the warnings per the ANI discussion re leaving his page blanked. Harry the Dog WOOF 20:17, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- Fair enough. My bad! I just figured that if the redirect remained the admin would be sent to the redirect page and would have to come back. But I guess that is easier than looking at the history. I have restored the warnings and will let [User:Hashmi, Usman]] delete them if he wants. Harry the Dog WOOF 20:22, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Dursun Karataş
Please undelete Dursun Karataş, he's a notable political figure. WP:BLP issues are not dealt with deletion, but with copyediting. --Soman (talk) 13:14, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks! I had the article on my watchlist, but had not noticed the prod. --Soman (talk) 15:32, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks!
Thank you for deleting my page! (note to others reading this, I'm not being sarcastic)! Cheers! WikiZorrosign 18:41, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] :O
   |
Thanks for sorting that out.
Have some flowers. 19:06, 22 May 2008 (UTC) |
|
[edit] Copyright violation
The editor who posted is not the copyright holder and the copyright holder has objected to the posted just below in the section marked comment. 70.243.80.195 (talk) 20:55, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry. I replaced it with just some text earlier, but other editors less mindful of copyright keep restoring the vio. 70.243.80.195 (talk) 20:59, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
-
- I'm sure Ultraexactzz has already figured out what's going on, namely that the author of the e-mail got caught canvassing and isn't happy about it. The "copyright violation" argument is bogus. Wikipedia can cite as much of the e-mail as it wants to, to demonstrate the rule violation. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 21:49, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Jack McClellan
Cool. :) Just a comment as I'm happy to wait for the AFD on this one. CSD G10 as written doesn't appear to apply only in instances where the attack is unreferenced. The sentence where referencing is raised reads as if this is simply one example of where the policy applies. That is, "This includes [but is not necessarily limited to?] a biography of a living person that is entirely negative in tone and unsourced". The main criteria, however, appears to be simply that the article "serves no purpose but to disparage their subject or some other entity". (Whether or not the only purpose of this particular page is to disparage the subject is in my view the main arguable point here.) Debate (talk) 04:41, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] living with michael
hello thank you for your message at that discusion on deletion I did learn from my new friend doctor strange that it was not an apropriate nominee however julube simply wanted to jump on me and acuse me of being part of kristy or a troublemaker I am not a troublemaker and althoughh I do have dedication to the cause of michael it is not malicios SDLexington (talk) 11:18, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] User:Hashmi, Usman revisted?
Please take a look at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Dutch_Danes. Some users are repeating the concerns that came up at ANI the other day (specifically about unnecessary ethnicity/nationality pages). Thanks. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 09:53, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] House music songs
Thank you for responding. "Good Faith" is fine; I have left explanations at most of my reverts, left messages on discussion boards related to the topic and even began a dialogue with this person. If you read my talk board, he/she doesn't seem all that friendly. Also -- I thought that Wiki dealt in FACT and this addition to the list just isn't factual! In any event, I am seeing that this whole fiasco is proving to be POINTLESS and that there isn't any hope for Wiki editors. I know a celeb who wanted to edit a non-factual tidbit about herself and was quickly blocked (?). That doesn't bode well for Wiki; I just want to contribute like anyone else, but this sort of thing seems to get out of hand all the time. I should perhaps learn how to become an administrator... (Mirror Ball 16:27, 27 May 2008 (UTC))
[edit] Presumption of Guilt
"I'm discussing the matter with Mwmalone (talk · contribs) on his talk page, but I'd also ask that you try to assume good faith with regard to Mwmalone; even if his edits appear to be vandalism, some benefit of the doubt may be in order. I've also asked Mwmalone to do the same (assume good faith) with regard to your edits. I'm hoping this can be discussed without further edit warring, and I'd invite you to raise your points at talk:Hot Summer (song).
This sound like you(and Wikipedia) have already decided in Noboyo's favor and presumed my guilt in the matter. This in not fair.
"I've requested that both Mwmalone (talk · contribs) and Noboyo (talk · contribs) discuss the genre of this song here. I note that a source was provided indicating that the song was House, which Mwmalone disputes. I would strongly ask that the matter be discussed and evaluated here, and that no further reversions take place, as the article is (and was) dangerously close to an edit war. Thanks in advance,"
Noboyo hasn't really provided any good sources, other than the fact that an artist from the group in question -- Monrose -- labeled it as "house music". That is akin to Dolly Parton labeling "Jolene" as disco; just because the performed says it doesn't make it a fact. Also, Noboyo has discussed NOTHING! He/she just made the changes and went on. I've heard the Wiki administration could be this presumptive, but this is my first time experiencing this. This issue doesn't look to have an easy resolution -- especially if you've already decided in Noboyo's favor! (Mirror Ball 18:30, 27 May 2008 (UTC))
[edit] RfA thank you spam
Hi there - thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which passed 69/10/3 yesterday. I will put the tools to good use and hopefully justify the confidence you had in me. Best wishes Fritzpoll (talk) 11:43, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] User:Sophiness
Could you please explain why you blocked User:Sophiness
I can only see 2 edits made in the last year, and those are the removal of an odd bit of one article. I don't think this is 'blatant vandalism'.
Also, why is it indefinitely blocked?
-- Chzz ► 09:23, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Monrose "house music" issue...
Hello again. I wanted to say that I appreciate your directing myself and the OTHER user "Dispute Resolution". However, Noboyo has NOT tried to discuss ANYTHING! I suspect that I will have to take this to the next level. Is that Arbitration? I wouldn't be so upset about it, but I HAVE left messages on the various discussion boards. Also, I created this list for the benefit of people trying to learn about the subject, and his "submission" just isn't factual. Your help is greatly appreciated. (Mirror Ball 13:17, 29 May 2008 (UTC)) Mwmalone
[edit] Thank you. I have taken your advice on the Monrose issue
The ball's in his/her court now. (Mirror Ball 13:39, 29 May 2008 (UTC))
[edit] Neurology categories
Ah thank you, yes, I did intend for those to be deleted as well. The reason for all these deletes is that they are almost all small typos (lower case 'n' in neurology means it needs to stay, upper case is a typo and needs to be deleted!) thanks :) Regards, CycloneNimrodTalk?Sign? 17:49, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks, that's very helpful :) Feel free to ask if you need anything in return ;) Regards, CycloneNimrodTalk?Sign? 17:54, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for May 19th and 26th, 2008.
|
|
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 4, Issue 21 | 19 May 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
||
| Volume 4, Issue 22 | 26 May 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:52, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVII (May 2008)
The May 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:26, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] WP:HAU
Hello yet again. I regretfully inform you that the bot we were using to update the user status at Wikipedia:Highly Active Users, SoxBot V, was blocked for its constant updating. With this bot out of operation, a patch is in the works. Until that patch is reviewed and accepted by the developers, some options have been presented to use as workarounds: 1) Qui monobook (not available in Internet Explorer); 2) User:Hersfold/StatusTemplate; 3) Manually updating User:StatusBot/Status/USERNAME; or 4) Not worry about it and wait for the patch to go through, which hopefully won't take long. If you have another method, you can use that, too. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Useight (talk) 18:01, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] May 8th IFDs still open
Could you take a look? Thanks Enigma message 02:12, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
- Yep, I only saw two. I was surprised that they remained open this long. Cheers, Enigma message 02:51, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Please, have a look
Hello, thank you for participating in the discussion on the Board of administrators. I am still unable to edit my user page, but can edit all other pages. Do you know what is wrong?--Moldopodotalk 16:22, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry, User:Flueras just started reverting all of my edits in the pure User:Bonaparte style (the one who supported Greater Romania propaganda and all related info alteration on Wikipedia). I asked her to stop and simply wait for a while, as I started writing the Moldavian-Ukrainian relations article. Instead I receive threats and true incivilities, which do not require a lengthy discussion as the one about the word "wicked" where you know very well. I can give you my word it is the sock of Bonny again because it is exactly teh same style and the same borderding insults remarks. Is there really nothing Wikipedia could do about this? She's been around for three years by now...--Moldopodotalk 17:40, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
I'm a new user who uses my own real IP so, enough with this drama. On the other hand I see Moldopodo's long history of blocks......and your last time was it only 2 days ago? and for what??? Disruptive editing, persistent incivility. See Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Digwuren See also Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Digwuren--Flueras (talk) 17:44, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:Moldopodo
- 10:54, 2 June 2008 Moreschi (Talk | contribs) blocked "Moldopodo (Talk | contribs)" (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of 48 hours (Disruptive editing, persistent incivility. See Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Digwuren)
- 19:13, 15 March 2008 Future Perfect at Sunrise (Talk | contribs) blocked "Moldopodo (Talk | contribs)" (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of 1 week (disruptive editing at Balti Steppe)
- 05:35, 31 December 2007 Mikkalai (Talk | contribs) unblocked "Moldopodo (Talk | contribs)" (false reason. For the last 7 days there was no edit conflict)
- 21:29, 30 December 2007 Scientizzle (Talk | contribs) blocked "Moldopodo (Talk | contribs)" (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of 14 days (Edit warring)
- 13:22, 23 December 2007 FisherQueen (Talk | contribs) blocked "Moldopodo (Talk | contribs)" (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of 1 week (Edit warring)
- 21:10, 26 November 2007 Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (Talk | contribs) unblocked "Moldopodo (Talk | contribs)" (on the proviso that he not go edit-warring again, espcially on romanian-related articles)
- 21:03, 25 November 2007 AGK (Talk | contribs) blocked "Moldopodo (Talk | contribs)" (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of 31 hours (disruptive editing: edit warring in order to push a particular opinion, anti-consensus edits despite repeated warnings, failure to heed cautions, et cetera)
- 20:42, 19 November 2007 Nat (Talk | contribs) blocked "Moldopodo (Talk | contribs)" (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of 24 hours (Edit warring)
(Latest | Earliest) View (newer 50) (older 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
- Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Log"
- Flueras - As a new user (registered today), you may not be aware of a policy we have around here called Assume Good Faith. Simply put, editors are required to assume that other editors are making a good faith effort to improve the encyclopedia. Tagging a page with an inuse template in order to expand an article is not disruptive, whereas reverting a user's edits across multiple articles and threatening them with blocks can be. If you disagree with someone, by all means - discuss it with them and come to a consensus. Just because a user has been blocked (and unblocked, as the log you posted notes) does not mean anything when they are attempting to make good faith edits, even if you disagree with those edits. UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 17:52, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
See here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement#User:Moldopodo --Flueras (talk) 18:09, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Why you think many people get tired of this disruptive editor? Because, after his block is finished he tries again to edit war and to impose its POV. Flueras (talk) 18:12, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
-
- Please see this http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Moldova&diff=prev&oldid=217301591 also. The way he inserts his POV again and again. Just today..Not to mention the way he, as a russian which hates NATO, wants that Moldova never to join NATO. See his edits. Flueras (talk) 18:38, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Not to mention he removed sourced text. I mean, even in the declaration of independence of Moldova from Russia it was said very clear that is Romanian language! And what did he do it? He removed this sentence... How vandalism!! --Flueras (talk) 18:45, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
- When you asked him why he removed a sourced statement, did he provide a reason? I hadn't noticed that removal in the diffs from that article - though there are quite a few from both of you over the last day or so. UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 18:49, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
I can link you the discussion with that troll in the archives, if you have time to spend it with that guy..:) Don't you see it's redundant to feed the troll? he's what he is, a disruptive editor. --Flueras (talk) 18:50, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&limit=500&target=Moldopodo&month=&year= see his last 500 edits... --Flueras (talk) 18:53, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi, Ultraexactzz. Flueras is an obvious sockpuppet of user:Bonaparte, so wasting your time in discussions with him is probably a bad idea. I have already informed our Bonaparte purge squad, but they are yet to react. I suppose I can formally ask for a checkuser, but this case is pretty obvious as it is. How many non-sock users do you know, who are aware of such things as the Digwuren ArbCom decision and the various WP policies he cites on their very first day on Wiki? He's getting more disruptive now, so a block is sorely needed to restore a semblance of order. --Illythr (talk) 18:55, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
- Another Russian who loves Moldova. Show your evidences. And I looked in block log of Moldopodo, where is also the link :) Flueras (talk) 18:56, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Look his mess http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Moldavian-Romanian --Flueras (talk) 19:03, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
FYI, Flueras has been blocked as a sockpuppet of the banned user Bonaparte. Khoikhoi 19:20, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
No problem. It was pretty obvious. ;-) Khoikhoi 19:23, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
For a regular non-rouge admin, AGF is the correct default modus operandi. For we have the Quenchers of the Truth to unclog the |'s... --Illythr (talk) 19:26, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Deletion of page entitled Mathew Regan
Hey ultra dude why did you delete my page?? I gave you a valid reason for keeping it and you deleted it anyway - what gives? I'll even send you a picture of the man in question if you don't believe me... —Preceding unsigned comment added by RipKurtDonaldCobain (talk • contribs) 20:20, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] My RfA
Hello, Ultraexactzz, and thank you for your recent participation in my RfA, which was closed per WP:NOTNOW after reaching a vote tally of 5/15/2. While I am disappointed in the outcome, I understand that it - as well as the comments left by yourself and others - was in the best interests of Wikipedia at this time. I plan to take everything that was written to heart and improve myself here on Wikipedia with a goal of perhaps accepting a nomination again in the future, should someone choose to nominate me. As a way of gathering further feedback, I have created a page in my user space for other editors to leave comments about things that they might have observed during my RfA and to continue my "education process," as it may be considered. If you would like to contribute to that page, it may be found here. Again, thank you for participating and I appreciate your comments! --InDeBiz1 (talk) 18:07, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks
Thank you for the complement on the FAR for Mercury. It was easy to work on having such a good team to work with. :-) -- Kheider (talk) 03:38, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you from me too, especially since you did the vast majority of the work :) Everyone involved in the Solar System featured topic owes you a debt of gratitude. Serendipodous 05:41, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] You're Akanaware's puncher
You're Akanaware's puncher
[edit] Signpost updated for June 2, 2008.
|
|
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 4, Issue 23 | 2 June 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:15, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Cordless Drill
Thanks for terminating that lot. I had somebody moving the page while I was trying to tag and explain it so it was all over the place. Exxolon (talk) 14:13, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
- Can you delete all the junk left over I've just speedy tagged too? Thanks Exxolon (talk) 14:16, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] FAR for Mercury (planet)
FYI. Thanks again for all of your help on this project. UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 02:11, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
- Well thank you for all of your work in getting the page back up to snuff. It looks much improved.—RJH (talk) 15:31, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
I think you deserve something more than a barnstar for your work:
 |
A ticket to Mars | |
|
Serendipodous 16:26, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] My Rfa
|
[edit] Thank You
Thank you for your comment on my RFA. I feel that your "apprenticeship" comment got through to me the most. I will make sure I learn everything correctly before my next go around. :) <3 Tinkleheimer TALK!! 19:25, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Ironholds
Hiya - thanks for the comment ! I suspect he wont get adminship this time, but I wouldn't want it to be purely because of a choice of userboxes. :-) CultureDrone (talk) 20:20, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- Besides, I wanted to make a nice uncontroversial statement that wouldn't make me too many enemies - that might be my name up there one day ! :-) CultureDrone (talk) 20:39, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Golf Club Management username change
It wasn't a "catch" on my part ... the name-watcher bot flags that "management" string automatically (as implying authority), and reported it to WP:UAA, where I dealt with it. Daniel Case (talk) 14:56, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Between Raising Hell and Amazing Grace
Thank you for your prompt response to that AFD, and for informing me on your action. Have a great day! Spell4yr (talk) 18:37, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] My RfA
Thanks for your mature and useful comments, and for taking the time to get involved in the first place :). I'll be enacting the changes advised by supporters/opposers/fence-sitters so i'll hopefully see you in 4-6 months :). Ironholds 20:53, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] User:MixtapeMassacre
This user already received a final warning from me, not five minutes ago. See the user talk history for the multiple warnings the user has received today, that didn't always get noticed due to the user's policy of blanking their talk page. -- roleplayer 23:04, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Deleting page Dave James
Hi there, just wondering why you deleted the page Dave James.I really admire the man and his achievements, so I was curious as to why you don't feel he deserves a Wikipedia page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Action10 (talk • contribs) 05:32, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks
Thank you! Kivar2 (talk) 02:29, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Chiacig??
I'm not sure what the Chiacig controversy is all about, but see contribs of Lisa-1982 (talk · contribs). Delicious carbuncle (talk) 21:04, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- Added to the existing ANI thread in case you're offline. Thanks. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 21:23, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Re: ArbCom statement
I was unaware both of the mistake and the correction you made. Thanks. Yechiel (Shalom) 01:45, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] My RFB
Thank you for your comments in my RFB. Since it was only at 64%, it was a shoo-in to be unsuccessful, so I withdrew. I didn't want it to run until its scheduled close time because my intent in standing for RFB was to help the bureaucrats with their workload, not give them one more RfX to close. Through the course of my RFB, I received some very valuable feedback, some of it was contradictary, but other points were well agreed upon. I have ceased my admin coaching for now to give me time to revamp my method. I don't want to give up coaching completely, but I'm going to find a different angle from which to approach it. As for my RFA Standards, I am going to do some deep intraspection. I wrote those standards six months ago and I will slowly retool them. This will take some time for me to really dig down and express what I want in an admin candidate. If, after some serious time of deep thought, I don't find anything to change in them, I'll leave them the way they are. I'm not going to change them just because of some community disagreement as to what they should be. Will I stand for RFB again in the future? I don't know. Perhaps some time down the road, when my tenure as an administrator is greater than one year, if there is a pressing need for more active bureaucrats, maybe. If there no pressing need, then maybe not. Useight (talk) 03:06, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] A note
I must have been on the page too long. I was looking for the AfD that was putting the log into a stub category, and I closed this AfD only to find that you did it about 10 minutes before hand. Just letting you know in case you noticed. I reverted myself. :) — MaggotSyn 12:30, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Your help please...
You were the closing admin for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Elliott. I'd like to determine whether this article was about the Time magazine writer. There seems to be lots of references to support a clear article about him.
- "Michael Elliot: He's having the Time of his life", The Independent, January 15, 2007. Retrieved on 2008-06-13. "Michael Elliott was not just the author of this global cover story, he also edited every edition of the world's most recognisable news magazine from Ireland in the west to Japan in the east."
- "Michael Elliott (TIME International) - Moderator", CEO Challenge 2008, 2008. Retrieved on 2008-06-13. "One of the world's leading commentators on international affairs, Elliott joined TIME as editor-at-large in 2001, after a year spent as editor-in-chief of eCountries, an internet-based news and information service on the global economy. Elliott spent 10 years at The Economist where he was political editor and Washington bureau chief, and the founding author of the Bagehot and Lexington columns, the first columns ever published in The Economist. He then spent seven years at Newsweek, and was editor of Newsweek International. He is the only person ever to have held top editorial positions at all three leading international publications."
- "Michael Elliott, TIME Asia Editor", Time magazine, Wednesday, June 2, 2004. Retrieved on 2008-06-13.
Could you pleas userify it for me at User:Geo Swan/Michael Elliott. Geo Swan (talk) 12:59, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for your prompt reply.
- I linked to Michael Elliott on December 24, 2007. It is my policy to check that the links I reference actually point where I think they point. If the version from December 24, 2007 actually pointed to an attack page then I lapsed.
- I'd like to know whether I lapsed. Would you mind, either, double-checking the state of the article, as of December 24, 2007 -- or userifying the article?
-
- Thanks for your 2nd prompt reply. Well, it sounds like I definitely lapsed in checking where my references pointed last December. Good to know.
- Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 13:30, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
