User talk:Ultraexactzz/Archive 3

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents 1 Sir I have edited this users content, but the user kept reverting 2 In Response 3 RfA 4 Sharesource 5 Deletion Review for Magillem 6 Re: Quick question on policy 7 Apollo 8 8 User:Pope Barry George 9 Thanks! 10 How Do You Submit An Entry In Checkuser 11 User:Suciindia 12 Got the warning 13 ECOLAS 14 Acknowledgement 15 Thanks 16 "I need opinion on Mediation Cases and Point of view pushing"[3] 17 thank spam 18 WP:AN/I 19 archiving accident 20 Miria (singer) and Gayle Day - refimprove 21 LOYOLAMD1 22 Fadiga and the Ip 23 Re: Signpost 24 Welcome to the Military history project 25 WP:AIV 26 Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Peteforsyth 27 The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVI (April 2008)

Sir I have edited this users content, but the user kept reverting

I agree completely with your accusations, but you need to understand that this is why I have been requesting the blocks against the user Thegingerone in the first place.Kevin j (talk) 19:45, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

In Response

No, I do not write like that kind of of person. The user harasses me, I respond. And no, the dispute will not be resolved for another day, because it needs to be resolved NOW. Read the content the user wrote earlier, because yes there is vandalism. Also, I only wrote the questions three times because it didn't seem like me voice was getting heard.Kevin j (talk) 20:42, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank for your concern. To answer you questions, all I want is the administrators to enforce the content in the articles like they should be enforced. One crucial policy to me is the NPOV policy. I want the resolution to be resolved through this enforcement, and I want it to be made clear to Thegingerone that it will be enforced and that it must be followed, and that the user, like all other users, will be blocked if the vandalism continues. BestKevin j (talk) 20:55, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

RfA

Hi there Ultraexactzz. Just a note of thanks for your support in my recent unsuccessful RfA. I do appreciate your vote and advice. I'll be back in a few months with more experience and more coaching, so I hope to have your support again then. Thanks again - Tanthalas39 (talk) 18:31, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Sharesource

Good job on cleaning the sharesource article.--Torchwood Who? (talk) 15:29, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I originally tagged it for advertising language before I applied the speedy tag. After a about fifteen minutes of good searching I couldn't find anything reliable so I speedy tagged it. I think the editor is going to be between a rock and hard place for sources and it might never make it past an AfD, but I'll keep my eye out for anything that might be of value.--Torchwood Who? (talk) 15:38, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Deletion Review for Magillem

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Magillem. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. - Barek (talk • contribs) - 19:34, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: Quick question on policy

Lists like that aren't allowed - the relevant policy is WP:UCS. :D Just remove it and block away if they try to play Johnny Dangerous. east.718 at 02:26, March 26, 2008

Apollo 8

By all means put the text in as a seperate section, but for consistency with all other spaceflight articles the bulleted list should be kept in place at the start. Hammersfan, 26/03/08, 23.29 GMT

Not really, because, as I have stated, for concistency every manned spaceflight article would need to be so altered. Besides, having looked at the text in detail, much of what is relevant I have put in the bullet list or added as notes. I have listed below bullet points about my views on the text:

• Date crew announced: Irrelevant - why should the date this crew was announced matter any more than the date any other crew was announced?
• Crew: Bulleted alongside roles - what their previous flights were is irrelevant in the context of this flight; all that is needed is the number of flights they have made as with all other missions.
• Swapping of Collins and Lovell: Mention made in the brief note I have left, along with the reason and the reference.
• Reason for Backup crew: Irrelevant, because that comes under the heading of "the blooming obvious" - for such a task, there are always backups.
• Haise being drafted in: Mention made in the brief note I have left.
  

Putting in a standard crew bullet list with notes, as is the case on other manned spaceflight articles, does not detract from its status as a featured article, but to me the whole point is that related pages should follow certain standards of concistency - manned spaceflight missions have similar layouts, and this mission, important as it was and well written as it may be, should follow these also. Hammersfan 27/03/08, 00.12 GMT

User:Pope Barry George

On top of the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muscle derived stem cells that you commented, he also posted this: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Jordan (singer) and please notice my comment about that "Jimbo" comment. Something need to be done.SYSS Mouse (talk) 15:58, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!

Someone vandalized my Userspace! But a little angel came along and fixed it! Thank you! You can thank others by using {{subst:Vangel}}! Nburden ^(T) 16:49, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

How Do You Submit An Entry In Checkuser

I haven't so long I forget how to add Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Mr Bullockx to the main checkuser page. -WarthogDemon 20:31, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. This is just ridiculous and I hope I can remain civil about it all. Happy editing! -WarthogDemon 20:52, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

You said it! But, I will not vent my frustration here. I will vent it by playing a computer game. There's nothing like causing death and destruction to entire civilizations, just because you feel like it. :) -WarthogDemon 21:35, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Suciindia

Hi, User:Suciindia posted some comments in talk page. The vandalism done by the IP 213.160.242.61 certainly does not belong to User:Suciindia. User:Suciindia is from India and the IP used by this account certainly will be of India. IP 213.160.242.61 is from Oslo [1]. This IP certainly does not belong to User:Suciindia. User:Suciindia is controlled by an Indian party. So can you review the block. Thanks. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 10:30, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Got the warning

The inclusion of the links along with my signature has discontinued... Can you please tell me what on earth the point thatHu12 is attempting to make? DrunkenDialer (talk) 08:58, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

ECOLAS

Dear UltraExactZZ, I stand for ECOLAS which has an article in Wikipedia that was challenged by you. You are asking to provide references. However, I don't know which certain information shold be marked with source. We are only starting organization and there are not many paper or electronic sources yet. Anyway, I would like to add anything if possible. But I myself don't see the information in the article as of nature where external references would be appropriate yet. Show me in which I am wrong. Thank you in advance for informing me so that I can enhance article's quality. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrej blacky (talk • contribs) 11:28, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

I've made corrections according to your comment. Is that enough to take tags references and wikify away? Isn't it rude to do it myself? --Andrej blacky (talk) 12:58, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Acknowledgement

Sorry about the messages. I didn't mean to violate policy, I've interacted with the above admins and wanted them to have first notice. No canvassing meant. ESCStudent774441 (talk) 03:54, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep it cool, okay?ESCStudent774441 (talk) 03:56, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

For [2]. Missed that one. Darkspots (talk) 23:22, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

"I need opinion on Mediation Cases and Point of view pushing"[3]

To your specific question, the creator of the above noticeboard post is most likely a sock of User:Mykungfu, and has been reported at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Mykungfu (6th); he's just taking advantage of the backlog and his new proxy to be disruptive, which as been his MO for some time. Whenever he/she is found, the puppet uses administrative complaints as retaliation, usually targeting the same editors as before his previous socks. See [4],[5], and [6].-RoBoTam^ice 21:18, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

thank spam

Thank you for voting in my RfA, which passed with 194 supporting, 9 opposing, and 4 neutral. Your kindness and constructive criticism is very much appreciated. I look forward to using the tools you have granted me to aid the project. I would like to give special thanks to Tim Vickers, Anthony and Acalamari for their nominations. Thank you again, VanTucky

WP:AN/I

Hey, I guess something went wrong and some current threads are lost [7]. Can you restore them please? Thanks Wiki San Roze ^†αLҝ 14:51, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Rather curious as to why the editor (Jsn...) chose to censor all of my contributions from yesterday. I'm suspecting a bit of trollery. Orderinchaos 15:05, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

I didn't revert you as such - I was restoring a nearly 2-hour-old version which was still intact. For some reason the editor went in and surgically removed random comments - several of which were mine from earlier in the day. Apologies if my actions caused any confusion or offence at your end - was certainly unintended. Orderinchaos 15:10, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

No worries, I think what happens when something bizarre like that happens is that different people with different bits of the story try to figure out what went on and end up at seeming cross purposes with each other until they all figure out what happened :) Gotta love community editing. Thanks for sorting it out. Orderinchaos 15:34, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, my messages seem to have sorted right. Wiki San Roze ^†αLҝ 15:41, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

archiving accident

Please see my response on my talk page to your inquiry... and if you could help me find an explanation for what is happening with my ban and my comments being deleted out of AN/I threads before archiving I would greatly appreciate it. Jsn9333 (talk) 16:46, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Miria (singer) and Gayle Day - refimprove

Hi - thanks for changing the status on my Gayle Day article from db-person to refimprove - if you get a chance can you look at my Miria (singer) article and see if you would agree that it makes sense to change that status as well?

Thanks very much! Achyls (talk) 23:31, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank you! I will endeavor to be a good WP citizen and find better sources. Achyls (talk) 18:27, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

LOYOLAMD1

Referring to Loyola College in Maryland and Loyola College Name Change, I am new to this, please specifically let me know what parts of my post seemed to carry a non neutral point of view as all of my comments were facts. Former Loyola College President Harold Ridley opposed a name change, that is a historical fact. The opposing view to the current name change are potential branding issues, that is a fact that this in an opposing view. Those with comments have been invited to contact the school directly by the methods I have mentioned.

I would be happy to change the references to academic programs at Loyola Universities if that was problematic. Please provide specifics as I am keen to have this page updates, this is relevant, newsworthy and timely information and that the public should know about in the event that they are seeking further information regarding Loyola College. Thank you. LOYOLAMD1 (talk) 15:06, 24 April 2008 (UTC)LOYOLAMD1 —Preceding unsigned comment added by LOYOLAMD1 (talk • contribs) 14:55, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Fadiga and the Ip

It´s true that I have a discussion with Fadiga in a few articles but: Isn´t it a HUGE cheat to edit with an IP number and with a count created? Isn´t a HUGE cheat to do what he wants with an IP, CHEATING the warning he recives? Please, one thing is one thing, and another thing is another thing... Don´t mix the issues, please. We are talking about tow different things... I can´t discuss with users that cheats, breaking the wikipedia rules...

See you, --Ultracanalla (talk) 14:04, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Re: Signpost

Thanks for the correction. It's a blind spot for the {{ffr}} OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 18:07, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Probably this article is the first time to go through FAR twice. I wonder what I should do if it becomes FA again and then delisted once again. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 19:32, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to the Military history project

WP:AIV

Hi. You reported an IP to AIV, and I have declined the report. While some of the IPs edits do not seem to be productive, and the IP is not discussing disputed edits in the proper way, there does not seem to be overt vandalism for which a block would be in order. I've cautioned the IP to discuss such disputed changes before making them, and I'll monitor as I can. If there are further shenanigans, please report them to the Administrator's Noticeboard for Incidents at WP:ANI, as this goes beyond the simple vandalism that AIV handles. Thanks, UltraExactZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 13:37, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Sorry we weren't able to help out this time around, and sorry you had to report multiple times. I've watchlisted some of the problem articles, and I'll keep an eye on the IP's contributions; If they revert without discussing, or if they revert a good faith edit as vandalism, ping me and I'll block if I'm around. For your reference, the report and discussion were moved to the talk page at WT:AIV. Thanks, UltraExactZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 13:59, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank you very much. ● 8~Hype ^@ 14:58, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Peteforsyth

Ooops, I forgot to change the vote. I did it now. Basically, I had the same concern, but realized it was not such a big thing. Bearian (talk) 18:31, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVI (April 2008)

The April 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:38, 3 May 2008 (UTC)