User talk:Ultra-Loser

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia.

Hello, Ultra-Loser, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Newcomers help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!
Wikimedia Foundation

--ΜιĿːtalk 10:49, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for that, Miljoshi. I've actually been with Wikipedia for several months already, but this is my first "welcome". Ultra Loser 11:07, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Torrent Project

We could use your help over at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Torrent Project. -- Paleorthid 04:09, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Metrics on our project performance are pretty hard to come up with, but I have taken a run at it. If your BitTorrent client keep tracks of file-specific accumulated upload, please tell it here. -- Paleorthid 16:32, 18 October 2006 (UTC)


[edit] please restore the comparison of bittorret sites

please improve it and restore it

I have worked so hard on this staff as u did!

[edit] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vinopolis

Hi, the article Vinopolis survived the afd discussion. You indicated on the discussion page that you might want to expand it, if you're still interested in that, please go ahead. Thanks. - Bobet 11:42, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] PEST AfD

Hi; sorry to bother you about this, but I discovered more info about the PEST article and it does indeed appear to be a hoax. The claims of recent usage by Crockspot appear to be incorrect; the claim that Ted Kennedy or other pundits (with the possible exception of Rush Limbaugh) used it is false. The AHA - the organization the doctor who coined the term is the Executive Director of - is a small new age quack organization in Boca Raton, not a professional organization of psychologists like the APA. The Columbia Journalism Review ridiculed the Boca Raton paper that published about this "phenomenon" for taking the doctor seriously. Of course, you may still think the article is worth keeping, but since you cited Crockspot's additions as the reason for your vote I thought I'd let you know about this new info.--csloat 09:28, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank you very much for notifying me of this - I've changed my vote. Ultra-Loser Talk | BT sites 15:09, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Comparison of BitTorrent sites

Hi there, I have removed the links in encyclopedia articles to the userspace essay / start of an article at User:Ultra-Loser/Comparison of BitTorrent sites. Thanks/wangi 12:31, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank you very much. Ultra-Loser Talk / Contributions 13:21, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Autoblocked

Um, yeah, my ISP serves dynamic IP addresses and as you can see, I've been using this composed-of-latin-characters username for quite a while now. Can I get unblocked please? Ultra-Loser Talk / Contributions 09:27, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Try editing, now; I think I got it. Luna Santin 09:41, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Yup, it worked, thank you very much! Ultra-Loser Talk / Contributions 09:48, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Moved Master of Science in Project Management

Thanks! – Gloy 14:37, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] New page

At your suggestion I've created Wikipedia_talk:No one cares, however I can't move it into the nontalk namespace. 68.39.174.238 22:45, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Deletion and protection of Comparison of BitTorrent sites

Hi Proto,

You deleted the Comparison of BitTorrent sites today, under the grounds that it's a recreation of deleted content. I am, however, familiar with WP:CSD, and it specifically states that the article can only be speedily deleted if it is "substantially identical" to the original. This was not the case - as I stated on the talk page, the new article had much more detail (which was the main complaint at the AfD) and cited sources.

If you feel that you cannot recreate this article in the mainspace, please recreate it in my userspace. I'd like to at least have a backup copy.

Best regards,

Ultra-Loser [ T ] [ C ] 23:58, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

User:Ultra-Loser/Comparison of BitTorrent sites 2. If you intend to recreate it as an article, let me know first so I can check it isn't virtually identical to the originally deleted article, as the one I deleted yesterday was basically the same, with the addition of some text - visible on the article(!) - informing people of the rules for how to add things to the list. Please don't re-add it to main article space - or try and create a similar page but with a different name - without checking with an admin, as it will probably be deleted again. Proto::► 10:01, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for userfying the article. However, my point with the citing of WP:CSD was that I believe the article was improperly deleted - it did not meet CSD G4 - and that it should be restored to the mainspace. Can you recreate it in the mainspace please? I'd rather not have to take it to WP:DRV. Ultra-Loser [ T ] [ C ] 04:19, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sorry to see you go

I haven't run across you in some time but as soon as I saw your name pop up on one of my watch listed articles saying that you were leaving...well I knew they would be one less good one standing on the walls. Take care. NeoFreak 06:49, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Another falls

Its really sad to see you go. I hate it when admins of Wikipedia doesn't listen to the people who contribute and create it. As you have stated earlier, content on Wikipedia is much more than a simple encyclopedia and everytime I see content like this being deleted or mucked around using AfD I get really angry. This is a great place with loads on information, usually one of the best places on the Web for information, but the management/moderators/administrators can make Wikipedia a slowly churning bureaucratic machinery that no one wants (which is a bit too common on the web as a whole too). It must be a living thing, constantly re-evaluating it self. At least thats the Wikipedia I want.

So thank you for your struggle Ultra-Loser and best of luck with the future. May it reward you better for your effort.

Fladvad 16:40, 18 February 2007 (UTC)