User talk:UltioUltionis

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I was block by someone because of sockpupetry. I dont know what I did wrong and I dont even know who blocked me. the name was not showing on the notice. if you will look through my edits you will definitely see that I did not do anything wrong and I edited pages in compliance with the wikipedia rules and always added Refrences to whatever edits I made."

Decline reason: "You were blocked by Husond (talk · contribs) as an obvious sockpuppet of the blocked vandal, Polscience (talk · contribs). — Yamla (talk) 18:05, 12 April 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Today I was blocked by user Husond for ellegedly being a sockpuppet of some user Polscience because as they argue, my edits were very similar to the ones of that user. As Husond mentioned on my talk page, he has a problem particalrly with my edits regarding transcontinental countries though he did not say what specifically he did not like. I have to tell you that my edits regarding transcontinental countries did not violate any wikipedia rule. I put there ONLY what could be proved and verified by the References and nothing else. I did not make things up .the data on those pages was Contradicting the information found on other pages such as the Europe page. I corrected articles. some of them were mentioning the same thing over and over in one paragraph confusing people such as the one on Georgia(country) page introduction, others did not provide any refrences or notes. if they wanted to leave it that way and let people get confused after seeng completely diffeent information from page to page, then I guess they dont want this encyclopedia to be a reliable sources of information that people will use wihout any fear of unreliable info. Husond said that they would check it in a checkuser.checkuser I believe can compare the edits of different editors but I dont know how will they prove this groundless and apocryphal accusation. they would not tell me something specific. what did I do wrong ? most of the editions were minor.did I put something there that could not be proved by the references ? NO.did I OMIT something without providing a reason ?NO. I dont know what happened but I know that this block is not fair.I might not be the most experienced wiki editor, but I know for sure that I did not do anything that would prompt anyone to block me."

Decline reason: "Per Yamla above. — Sandstein (talk) 22:04, 12 April 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.