Talk:Ugly duckling theorem
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Philosophy, which collaborates on articles related to philosophy. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details. | ||||||||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. | ||||||||
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating on the importance scale. | ||||||||
|
|||||||||
Yes, this is pretty much a copy of the page on Everything2 with the same name. I can do that: I wrote that one. Probably needs some formalizing and formatting. Clsn 18:15, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
wtf?
Blueaster 08:16, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] References and wrong content
Please add some print references to this article, not just a link to another page you have written.
- Link added to Watanabe's book, or at least a scan of the relevant part of it, which is what I could find. Maybe my statement of it is original, but the research isn't.
The sentence you added again is clearly wrong; there must be additional assumptions on the theorem that says that the set of attributes representing each object has a 50/50 chance of containing any particular attribute. CMummert 03:51, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] the German version
I find a quite detailed article on this topic in the German wikipedia: de:Ugly-Duckling-Theorem, but I don't understand German. So it would be great if someone could translate that one into English. Took 02:45, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
- It would be nice if someone could either translate that one or fix it, as the mathematics is wrong. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 22:19, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
