User talk:U-Two

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] ???

I take it that you are a vandal/spammer?! well if you keep this stuff up sr, you will be kicked from here! please try to remain civil!--Lolcon-R-US 17:43, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Warning

We remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

Images get lost on wikipedia all the time... Angel Emfrbl 22:10, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Ha! Is that it. I got away with calling U a Dyslexic bitch and this is all I get. Haha! I'm suprised you've spelt all that warning right ...or did you just copy and paste it. XP XP XP XP

U-Two 00:27, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

thanks for the welcome! I have a question... how come you can't edit the article about Whales?LeCrud Jam 22:04, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Do you have a link to the page your having problem's editing?
U-Two 21:54, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Yep. Here it is... Whale umm. just so you know, I'm not really sure if I pressed the right button for a link, but let's try it! LeCrud Jam 22:13, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

To edit the page just press Edit this page. It's at the very top of the page in bold. Good luck.
U-Two 21:54, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

There's no tab at the top of the page with a bold EDIT THIS PAGE on it. Is it just my computer?LeCrud Jam 22:17, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

The page has been locked from editing. This means you won't be able to edit it unless an administrastor unlocks it, or you wait a few days. New members usually cannot edit articles that have been locked until a certain period of time, usually a few days, to avoid vandalsim.
U-Two 21:54, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

alright. thanks. I'll wait a few days. LeCrud Jam 22:24, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Administrators

Hi again. How do you become an administrator? LeCrud Jam 23:58, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Sorry for the delay to reply. Read this if you want to become an administrator.
U-Two 21:54, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. I read the page:) LeCrud Jam 01:26, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disgrace?

What on earth? Nobody is perfect but to say I am a disgrace is a bit weird after all the work I've put into the project ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Expecting you" Contribs 21:13, 16 June 2007 (UTC) Whats with the aggro -the attitude of your user page tells it all ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Expecting you" Contribs 21:14, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

My articles such as History of Exploration in Tibet, Abbas Kiarostami (an FA), Wildlife of Pakistan, Shalu Monastery, The Temptress Joymati, Uttara (film), Torrent (1926 film) are only a tiny exmaple of what I have achieved on wikipedia. I founded Wikipedia:WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers - an important porject that I took some time to set up, WikiProject Tibet, and co-founded WikiProject James Bond - already articles such as Goldeneye and Casino Royale 2006 film we have worked on are FA proposals. I as everyone make minor errors from time to time but can you honestly say this is all a disgrace? You're bang out of order with those comments - what is it going to achive by telling me I'm a disgrace. Nothing. If there is a problem tell me and I can correct it. ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Expecting you" Contribs 10:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

And?...
U-Two 20:22, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

I see this is not the first time. Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Punkmorten 10:47, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

I see this is not the first time.
Haha, what gave it away:).
U-Two 20:22, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your recent RfA

I'm sorry, but I've closed your Request for adminship prematurely. Simply put, you've only got 146 edits on Wikipedia; while edit count isn't the only determining factor, and numerous people have their own personal standards that they judge RfA candidates by, there was no chance that the RfA was going to pass.

I'm sorry about this, and hope you don't take it personally. If you continue to contribute to the project in a positive fashion, I'm confident that you could possibly run a successful RfA in the future. You may want to consider submitting yourself to Wikipedia:Editor review for feedback on where to get some good experience, and when you're ready for RfA again, there's a great Wikipedia:Admin coaching program for you to use, as well as a guide to requests for adminship.

In your RfA, you say that you are highly active. However, you only had four edits in the entire month of May this year; this is far below the norm expected from a serious RfA candidate (even four edits a day isn't considered "quite active").  EVula // talk // ☯ // 20:59, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

I wasn't really expecting anything. LOL. Thanks anyway.
U-Two 21:54, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Alexis Skye

Hi. I've removed the speedy tag you put on Alexis Skye because I don't really see the copyright violation that you claim exists. This is not to say that I found the subject so interesting but this should really go through articles for deletion and not speedy deletion. Cheers, Pascal.Tesson 02:56, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

You just don't give things a chance do you? ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Talk"? 10:23, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Its Ok

Ha its ok Mate no need to thank me if you ever need anyone to vandilise ur page again you know who to ask Yours sincerely "noob" —Preceding comment was added at 19:42, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Cute. XD U-Two 18:03, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] London Meetup - January 12, 2008

Hi! There's going to be a London Wikipedia Meetup coming Saturday January 12, 2008. If you are interested in coming along take part in the discussion over at Wikipedia:Meetup/London7. The discussion is going on until tomorrow evening and the official location and time will be published at the same page late Thursday or early Friday. Hope to see you Saturday, Poeloq (talk) 02:20, 10 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SamStacy011.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SamStacy011.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:03, 24 January 2008 (UTC)