User talk:Typhlosion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] (R|L)u(k|c)ario

Could you please not change instances of Rukario to Lucario, or vice versa? This is a contentious topic, there's no real consensus, and I don't forsee a consensus being formed before Nintendo finally announces a final name. Changing them just engenders pointless revert wars, which don't serve anyone. - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 00:53, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

Sorry. It was my understanding that the English name had been confirmed. Typhlosion 00:56, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

If you could cite a source for that, feel free to change them (and I'll defend your changes). - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 01:36, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] CRC

I like paihj. By the way, where's that CRC link that you had as a subsection of your user page or whatever? Did it get deleted or something? ArphaxadHunter 16:57, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

I put a deletion request in earlier. Sorry. —Typhlosion 00:29, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] PKMN.net

Are you the Typhlosion from PKMN.NET? -Ace_ofspade

I haven't even heard of it. Why do you ask? —Typhlosion 18:13, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jaŋalif

Hi! Jaŋalif article needs review of someone whose native language is English.--Untifler 11:38, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] EVO

We are already discussing that over here! Though you're right about the line, Garudamon still digivolved from Aquilamon regrdless of the previous form, so issues like that are trival in my opinion.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Digimon_Systems_Update#Where_to_use_some_evos

[edit] List of Digimon with different English and Japanese names

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article List of Digimon with different English and Japanese names, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. -- Ned Scott 04:07, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Digimon Wikia

While their front page format is recent, the digimon wikia is nearly a year old. Personally, I'd rather link to the far more active wikimon, but maybe that's just me.Circeus 02:45, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] "Fixing" Redirects

Please don't fix redirects as you did in this edit: [1]. In some cases, these are links to future articles and there is no real benefit to fixing them anyway. See Wikipedia:Redirect#Do not change links to redirects that are not broken for more information. --Holderca1 talk 13:27, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Okay, obviously you are choosing to ignore me. [2] --Holderca1 talk 19:16, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
I second this - read WP:USSH please. Further edits such as this may lead to blocks and WP:RFC. --Rschen7754 (T C) 05:00, 9 May 2008 (UTC)