Talk:Typhoon Ewiniar (2006)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Typhoon Ewiniar (2006) article.
Article policies
Archives: 1
Good article Typhoon Ewiniar (2006) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
Hurricanes
 This page is within the scope of WikiProject Tropical cyclones, which collaborates on tropical cyclones and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance within WikiProject Tropical cyclones.
Map of Korea This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a project to build and improve articles related to Korea. We invite you to join the project and contribute to the discussion.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the importance scale.
See also: Talk:Typhoon Ewiniar (2006)/Archive 1

Contents

[edit] Todo

Good work on this. The only todo I can think of is put it up for a GA nom, unless you have other plans first. --Hurricanehink (talk) 12:41, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

I don't, actually. This is pretty much done, unless NWS Guam gets back to me with more info. Chacor 13:08, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
GA-nommed. Chacor 04:49, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ewiniar Redeemed?

Hey, I thought everyone merged Ewiniar to the 2006 Pacific typhoon season but how come it came back, and how did it, and who did it? Alastor Moody (talk) 08:29, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
We unmerged it because we found a lot of info on the storm after it had died, so we created an article. All the better for Wikipedia, if we can get good-quality articles in. I mean, honestly, which do you think is better, Choice A or Choice B? Chacor 10:43, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
Chacor's right. Articles are too hard to make while they are current. The good stuff comes from after the fact, when we know what the storm is going to do. --Hurricanehink (talk) 12:47, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] GA Passed

Good job everyone. Another hurricane article on the GA list. Tarret 14:30, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] NCDC

The article should be updated using NCDC info for Guam. They have a damage total and some more info in general. Hurricanehink (talk) 14:49, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

[1] Nothing. Guam was never affected by Ewiniar, btw. WFO Guam were involved as their AOR includes CNMI, Micronesia and Palau. – Chacor 15:12, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
You should have looked at NCDC, as I said. $105,000 in damage, due to storm surge and minor crop damage. Hurricanehink (talk) 15:19, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] GA Sweeps Review: Pass

As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2006. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would also be beneficial to update the access dates of the website sources. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 01:01, 4 March 2008 (UTC)