User talk:Tyler-07

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

What is said IP address? -- Tawker 01:42, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

24.166.131.119


An update plz admins?

Please assume good faith when dealing with other editors. See Wikipedia:Assume good faith for the guidelines on this. Happy editing!

Please do not remove messages from your talk page. Talk pages exist as a record of communication, and in any case, comments are available through the page history. You're welcome to archive your talk page, but be sure to provide a link to any deleted comments. Thanks. --Sbluen 01:59, 29 May 2006 (UTC)


Administrators please update thanks --Tyler-07 02:09, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

It says admins are supposed to leave comment as to what the decision is that has been made....so plz leave comment to as what is going to be done. thank you. --Tyler-07 02:23, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

are admins always assholes in ignoring you? Tyler-07 03:09, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

fuck...

Unblocked. --Sam Blanning(talk) 11:27, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Ty Warner

Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to Ty Warner. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Scientizzle 03:41, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to User talk:210.15.254.41, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Scientizzle 03:43, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Um, no. Even though I'm not an admin, I regularly revert vandalism and warn those that perpetrate the acts. If you have proof that your account did, in fact, not vandalize the articles that I listed, leave that on your talk page under my warnings or ask an admin to clear your name--if you clear your own talk page it only makes you look guilty. Removing warnings can be considered vandalism. Your talk page is meant to be an ongoing record of your interactions with other editors. Removing potentially important information makes it hard for others to act in good faith. -- Scientizzle 17:35, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
Look, I'm a nice, reasonable guy. If I was incorrect in warning you, please ask a 3rd-party admin to clear your name--If that happens, I'll remove my warnings myself from your usertalk with sincere apologies. Until then, I'll consider my warnings valid and attepts to remove them not in good faith.

Listen, my name is already cleared. If my name hadn't been cleared, the admins would not have unblocked me. So please consider that as clearing my name...and I'd rather not waste admin's time on this matter. Tyler-07 18:29, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

I unblocked you because you were being affected by a block on an IP, but had never been blocked yourself. That doesn't change the fact that you blanked large amounts of text without reason earlier today [1] [2] [3]. Those edits are from your account, not your IP address. Moreover, Scientizzle is correct, anyone may issue warnings. Just edit positively and pretty soon you'll find your talk page filling up with useful discussions and thank you notes, and the warnings won't matter. --Sam Blanning(talk) 19:12, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Removing warnings that are placed by users *not admins) are not official warnings, and therefore removing them does not constitute vandalism. Tyler-07 03:04, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Absolute nonsense. --Sam Blanning(talk) 08:11, 30 May 2006 (UTC)


FYI I have not been editing any articles unconstructively, so please get your information straight before giving me useless warnings, and i havent been demolishing any hard work of others. thanks


Regarding attack on Scientizzle at User talk:Kylesmom69.

This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks, you may be blocked for disruption. Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 03:16, 30 May 2006 (UTC)


Regarding removal of official warnings.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 03:19, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for repeated vandalism. If or when the block expires, please refrain from vandalizing or this account will face longer blocks, and action could be taken against the individual who uses it. Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 03:22, 30 May 2006 (UTC)


Please do not remove content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Scientizzle 03:49, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to User talk:24.166.131.119, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Scientizzle 03:50, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to User talk:Scientizzle, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Scientizzle 03:51, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
It has become apparent that your account is only being used for vandalism, and so has been blocked indefinitely. Please do not create further accounts for the purpose of vandalism; if you do so, further action may be taken against you.
Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 02:00, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Please do not remove legitimate warnings from your talk page or replace them with inappropriate content. Removing or maliciously altering warnings from your talk page will not remove them from the page history. You're welcome to archive your talk page, but be sure to provide a link to any deleted legitimate comments. If you continue to remove or vandalize legitimate warnings from your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks. -- Scientizzle 16:26, 17 October 2006 (UTC)