User talk:Twsx/Archive 2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Re: Boo

Quite a rise you took on since i last came by. Ever thought about applying for adminship? :) ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | 13:27, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Hey there!

Thanks for the message. :) I would not mind being administrator, but I do not think I am quite ready for the whole nomination process; I have a lot to improve on. I will maybe go through some admin coaching, but it's only a vague idea in my mind at this stage. Plus, I do not quite feel I need the administrative privileges at this point to improve my work on Wikipedia. However, this may change in a couple of months. ^^

Zouavman Le Zouave 16:16, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Alright. :) If you ever feel you're ready, and you don't happen to have a more credible user (shouldn't be hard to find though), tell me, i'd nominate you. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | 18:21, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, I really appreciate it. :) Rock on! Zouavman Le Zouave 19:11, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Hey! I just started my Editor Review. Feel free to review my contributions, here. ^^ Zouavman Le Zouave 11:12, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] DRV

I have initiated a deletion review of an AFD which you were involved in. You may wish to contribute to the discussion. Balancer 04:56, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Linkin Park

Read First the talk page why Minutes To Midnight is not an alternative metal and rapcore record! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.167.215.209 (talk) 13:24, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Objection

If you are taking off saliva and soil from the list of nu metal than I think that P O D should be also heck POD should be christian metal but I guess its your decision but its not a very good one. I think that saliva and soil have a sound thats upbeat uptempo I mean thats not very slow but also not very fast this should be the distinction from the rest, if they're loud and have heavy guitars riffs that flow perfect from one step to the other and killer beats from the drummer and you can also understand what the lead singer is saying than I think that all of that genre should be considered nu metal. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.160.17.33 (talk) 09:17, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

I understand your concern about SOiL as they probebly touch the border to nu metal, but Saliva? I see no relation whatsoever, they are as far away from nu metal as iron maiden is. But, you are always free to change the article to the bext you know. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | 16:11, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Useless

I don't really appreciate you referring to my edits as "useless". I reverted your reversion with a more detailed explanation on the talk page.Game Collector 15:25, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

I replied on Talk:World of Warcraft. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | 18:07, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] If I Must

The person was not a real user, and the comment was not only offensive but had unjustifiable language in it. How can we trust people who are not real users? These are usually the people whose edits need to be reverted. Besides, I won't change it again, this whole thing is stupid.Navnløs 22:41, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

You seem to be visiting some of the pages I have gone to recently. I understand the decapitalizing of Metal to metal, but why exactly are you decapitalizing Death to death and Black to black in front of the metal names after the first line on Sarcofago and Bathory? I've never seen other pages do that and it frankly does not make sense.Navnløs 22:51, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

See WP:MUSTARD. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | 23:00, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WHOA

You're are about to go over a line there and I don't like it. First off, you're TELLING me I NEED to trim my user page? What for? Secondly I don't care what you believe, but other than not liking mallcore, all of my edits here on wikipdeia have been extremely serious and have only added to the greatness of wikipedia. I am no vandaliser or detractor of wikipedia, got that? You don't think I want to add to wikipedia? WELL TOO BAD. You're wrong! All of my contributions including making some band pages have been just to add here on wikipedia. I happen to like wikipedia and im a serious wikiholic. I just dont like nu metal.Navnløs 22:57, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

I don't like a number of musical genres. You know what i do? I leave them alone. Or, if i find to be able to make a real contribution to it, i make sure it is valuable and, if controversial, can be reliably referenced. Your edits fail all of those points. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | 23:05, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Not to mention, "While i do not believe you have an honest interest in adding to wikipedia, i nevertheless hope to see a change." really is insulting! What are you my father? You hope to see a change? Yeah I wont mess with others opinions on talk pages, but I have always considered myself a good contributor to wikipedia. I have added and changed many things (for the better) even before I had this profile. And I always back up what I have to say with facts. I'll have you know that I am NOT biased in other areas except when it comes to mallcore, rap, emo, post-hardcore (scremo) and well just a couple other things. But all my edits on metal pages and other stuff are help wikipedia.Navnløs 23:03, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

If that is so, then you might want to create a legit sockpuppet for your edits on the topics you dislike, as they don't quite make you look like a valuable contributor. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | 23:09, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

My sources WERE reliable and if they were'nt it was ONLY on the nu metal page. Also see Wikipedia:Manual of Style (capital letters), as I believe, if you read it, I think they were only referring to genres in senteces and not in the info musicboxes. I apologize for creating a ruckus but I do truly get offended when someone implies certain things such as me not being serious about wikipedia. Have a nice day.Navnløs 23:14, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Unclear. However, WP:ALBUM [[1]] states that they should be comma seperated and not capitalized. Although this is for album infoboxes, there is no reason to believe this doesn't apply for an infobox on a band article as well, as it is pretty much the same. And no, your sources on your change to nu metal were not reliable for wikipedia. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | 23:26, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] RE: Sarcófago genre list.

I'm totally aware of the guidelines, and I'm aware no guideline prohibits the use of line break separated genre lists in the musical artist infobox. As it is a list, every row should be capitalized, and since one genre spans two rows using commas ("metal" is being displayed on the second row, which is not very pretty) I reverted it. I don't care about commas or line breaks, but genres spanning two rows is too ugly. Kameejl ^(Talk) 17:09, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

There have been discussions on how to format genres in the musical artist infobox and consensus has never been reached (some want <br />, others commas). Therefore no guideline has ever been made to impose a particular lay out. You have no valid reason to impose a lay out. WP:ALBUM guidelines don't apply to {{infobox musical artist}}, and WP:MUSTARD contains no information on genre lay out. Kameejl ^(Talk) 02:23, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] RfC for User:Scipo

I have started a request for comment for User:Scipo regarding his reverting of genre changes. If you'd like to endorse this RfC or comment, please do so at Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Scipo. Wyatt Riot 23:16, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for signing it! I realized afterwards that, by initiating the process on a Friday night, there was a chance I wouldn't have another signature within the required 2 days. So thanks again! :) Wyatt Riot 22:17, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re:Your show/hide JS boxes

By all means, take them and enjoy then. I copied them from somebody, too :) --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk} 23:20, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hello

I almost missed fighting with you today. You know you really do like some good bands. I'm surprised at your listing In Flames as not metal, though. They are melodic and they're newer work is starting to stray from their roots, but there is no doubt they were metal for a long time. In other news, I just thought I'd tell you I changed all those pages we usually fight over (Amon Amarth, Sarcofago, etc.) and I noticed something. Without you here nobody changed them!! It was almost weird. Everyone left them the way they were, with line breaks. Anyways, I know you'll eventually be back on to continue the battle, and as much work as it is, I almost look forward to it. Once we are finished with this, though, I hope we can work together on more productive things. I took you for a total nu metal person, and as much as I dislike the genre and its fans, you do like other good bands and you do seem knowledgeable about things. (I still think the nu metal article should say something about how people view it, the good and the bad, just as many other metal genres look at the good and bad views here on wikipedia) Anyways, happy day off =) Navnløs 21:49, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

I do have to admit that it's only been around four hours since I edited those pages, but still that's a long time for no one to change my edits with the line breaks...perhaps, just maybe, there are more people who agree with the line breaking method than we think. Navnløs 21:54, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] RE:RE:

I think I can excuse your, uh, "abstinence" LOL. Well, I know what you meant. I still believe it is easier on the eyes to see the genres one by one as eveything else is listed on a one by one basis in the music infobox. Also, User:Kameejl left a comment on my page after you left yours.

"I was browsing by and had to reply to this comment. I really don't think "the majority takes side for commas". Most infoboxes use line breaks. Just look for a random non music infobox and you'll see, line breaks are generally used (company, actor, planet, and many other infoboxes)." Kameejl ^(Talk) 14:48, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Just thought you might want to know.Navnløs 19:31, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

I'd also like to point out that those pages we usually fight over have still yet to be changed to comma breaks =). I think more people like the line break than you think. Navnløs 19:41, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

AHA!!! Well the pages we once fought over have still yet to be changed. I did notice, however, that you tried to change Amon Amarth but someone immediately changed it back...I'm telling you those line breaks are getting more popular by the day lol. Navnløs 22:33, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Dear Twsx and Dear Scipo,

Regarding Article: Amon Amarth

Dear Twsx and Dear Scipo, May I remind you both not to get into an edit war, it's only a comma!! Please both of you Have a Nice cup of Tea and Sit Down The guidelines on the template page do not specify, however in the example on the template page shows the genres to be separated by commas and are all on the same line. PhilB ~ ^T/_C 20:01, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Please Come with me to disguss this on the articles talk page PhilB ~ ^T/_C 21:04, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] How's things?

Whats up? It's been a while. Dissesction rules, but do you happen to like their last album or their first two? Navnløs 19:33, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

I guess i like them alike, allthough they are kind of different in style. I would however prefer it if you would keep conversations between us about wikipedia and wikipedia related matters, no offense. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | 15:00, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Sounds good. I have to say, though, that I think there last album reeks as they changed their style totally and went all melodeath...but bad. Navnløs 18:39, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

I couldn't help but notice you were trying to change the Sarcofago, Bathory and Amon Amarth pages, again. You're not seriously gonna start this all over again, are you? Navnløs 19:06, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

I went by it on my usual, being-bored tour through my watchlist, saw them being messed up and changed them, what else. And i am not starting anything, i am keeping to what has turned out to be in favour amongst editors, yet too controversial to be written down as a rule. The one on a streak to enforce his point of view by pushing every article to his personal liking is you, not me, hence your ban. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | 19:19, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disturbed - Stricken in Guitar Hero III

Hey,

I notice that you keep removing a certain user's addition to Song Appearances - Stricken in Guitar Hero III. I understand why you keep doing it, and I saw the message you added, but I think that, since the Guitar Hero series is quite popular, it should be added under Song Appearances, especially since non-notable movies like Valentine are put in there. What do you think? Dan 23:32, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

I removed what i knew not to be notable for such a list, I can't guarantee that those who were left in the list are. We'd rather delete the entries of your concern. The whole list is trivia anyway. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | 01:12, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Armistice

Please take a look at Template_talk:Infobox_Musical_artist#Armistice, I thought you might be interested. Kameejl ^(Talk) 12:25, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WP:RFA

Just a little note to let you know to be careful when editing this page. This edit removed the dashes from under the last RfA. In doing so, it removed the RfA from the summary list and cause it to be closed late, which can be stressful for the candidate. So just a head's up. Thanks for your consideration. Lara❤Love 19:08, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Restoring Guild page

A vandal broke any links to Guild information pages on the World of Warcraft US Illidan server page here-

http://www.wowwiki.com/Server:Illidan_US

My Guild's page continued to exist but I did not know how to re-establish the link. So what I did was click on the existing dead link and pasted the guild info into that page. Now it has been scheduled for deletion, which will again remove our listing from the Illidan page. Can you please fix it so that there is only one TBC page that links from the Illidan server page? Thanks.

Our two pages-

http://www.wowwiki.com/%28TBC%29_The_Black_Company (actively linked to Illidan)

http://www.wowwiki.com/Guild:The_Black_Company_%28Illidan_US%29 (unlinked) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.2.75.26 (talk) 16:11, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Done. However, please contact me on my talk page on WoWWiki instead of here the next time. :) ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | 17:39, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re:Request for comment

Oh sorry! I didn't realise. My apologies. I thought you were asking for an opinion on the page. And apologies if it seemed like I was being hostile. It's important for one to completely neutral and not show any bias towards any "groups". Sorry again! Scarian ^Talk 14:48, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] FYI

The page you are making about line breaks and comma breaks is fine. What I don't like is your complete bias toward me. You say I keep reverting pages to my own benefit. This is a lie. I did do that somewhat before (though not in the fashion you phrase it), but since the armistice and even somewaht before that I have completely stopped doing anything to do with line breaks or comma breaks except make sure they stay the way they are, even if I don't like it. There's other biases I would argue against on that page but right now I don't have the time. You are going to force me to make a page making my own arguement and possibly against you, which is not my wish, but I must defend myself and I'm prepared to do so. I would appreciate if you cut the section about me out, as I am only one person in a group of many that argue for line breaks, just as you are only one in a group of many and I would not want to attack you in such a fashion. Blizzard Beast ^$ODIN$ 20:49, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Also, you should'nt fault me for changing pages before. You did the same and we both claimed that our side was bigger and more favourable, etc. I would think we have also both veered away from that course agreeing to say that both sides are the same, despite personal beliefs. Blizzard Beast ^$ODIN$ 20:52, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Reverting

Twsx, did we all agree not to change the infoboxes anymore no matter what state they were in? Scarian ^Talk 18:20, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

I mentioned the terms of my part of the deal when I originally agreed to the armistice. However, as I have broken what I have agreed to a couple of days ago, I retracted my acceptance now [2]. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | 18:54, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

What do you want to achieve by doing this? Kameejl ^(Talk) 19:19, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

I do not try to achieve anything. And I stopped answering to some questions at the point I realized I would just be repeating myself. I will answer again once anything I can respond to surpasses what is already written here. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | 19:24, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

If you do not want to achieve anything, then it's wiser to stop changing genre layouts. It only leads to edit wars. Kameejl ^(Talk) 19:33, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

I have taken this into consideration. However, the feeling that it is "right", and even more, the rude gestures of Navnlos, pursuade me otherwise. Nothing drives me further than a person quoting rules on me in such a distinctly falsified way. Can we get back from socializing to either the topic or silence, now? ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | 20:09, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

You've reverted Navnlos because you can't stand him? That sounds like trolling. Are you willing to keep the articles as they were, to stop your edits and agree to the truce? Than we might not need dispute resolution. Kameejl ^(Talk) 20:29, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

You reverted Navnlos because you can't stand him? - Not what I said. Keep the articles as they were? What point in the history of edits consititutes as "the state in which they were"? ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | 20:35, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

What did you mean by "the rude gestures of Navnlos, pursuade me otherwise"? And the way they were when the truce started. Kameejl ^(Talk) 21:35, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

I have never been rude to you. I called you a dick once in the past and appologized for it. Blizzard Beast ^$ODIN$ 20:16, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Should I count false accusations too? As in, should I refer to ~10 or ~25 diffs? ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | 20:35, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

I don't make false accusations and the few times that I did accuse you of something was not out of rudeness, even if you think it was wrong. You seem to think of everything as "rudeness". Would it be better if I said "I'm sorry, good sir, but I do believe you did something wrong and I therefore must most humbly revert it." Would that make you think I was less rude? Yeah' I've accused you of something a few times but I wasn't rude about it. I said "Look, here's the situation and I think you're doing something wrong Twsx." That's not rude. Even if w/e I'm talking about is wrong, it's not rude. I don't bullshit around. I say my mind, and I think that's an honorable quality and I'm not offensive about it, so if you think that's rude, well idk what to say. Blizzard Beast ^$ODIN$ 23:34, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AN/I Thread

There is a discussion about you editing on the Administrators' Noticeboard, here. Pastordavid (talk) 18:51, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The London Accord

I have added two reasons for notability.

It is non-government funded

It is the largest investment research project to date on climate change. $7M to $15M

I hope that you will remove the speedly delete as soon as you can Mike Young (talk) 15:56, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Hello. Just stating those things do not make the article notable. Also, it is not me you have to convince, it is the whole, so you should find reliable sources that establish notability for the company, and then add those sources to the article. You can find more information about notability on wikipedia at WP:N. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | 17:10, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Deletion of article on the London Accord

I note that the article on the London Accord has been deleted three times now. Most administrators when seeing the rebirth of an article that has been deleted three times will (undertandably) automatically re-delete it without looking at it.

I am writing to request you not to do this, as I honestly believe that the reasons given have been addressed now.

I have recreated the article at User:Mike Young/LondonAccord. I have expanded it and added other stuff to make a useful article which cannot resonably claim to be copy vio (remember the London Accord website is open source). I see no reason why the article in its present form should be deleted. However you may. Please feel free to comment on the article on it's talk page, or even better to help me improve it by editing it into a form which you will find acceptable as an article. This is a much more sensible course of action than engaging in a deletion war. I would appreciate a "Yes this is OK" on the talk page if you think this is not an article that warrants a speedy delete.

Thank you very much in anticipation for your time. Mike Young (talk) 02:22, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Hello. The article still contains the very same text as the homepage does which is, according to the homepages legal disclaimer, a violation of copyright. It will most likely be deleted again if added to the mainspace in it's current form. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | 08:09, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Notability and H.J.Gauntlett

Excuse me, but I fail to see how H.J. Gauntlett is notable. There is no references whatsoever and it reads like an ad. I highly suspect, though I may wrong, that the author is H.J.Gauntlett. May I ask, in good faith, where do you see the notability?--Kannie | talk 02:41, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Hello. It was a mere assumption that I made after doing a google search, and tagged it, since no matter if it is notable or not, the article is in a state in which it would need to be wikified and expanded. You can, obviously, still propose deletion or request speedy deletion if seen fit. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | 07:45, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Hello, Twsx. You have new messages at Kannie's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} template.

Mukasa Dada / Willie Ricks -- I authored the re-post on this legendary grass roots organizer from the civil rights movement, and would appreciate an opportunity to add citations to support the facts in the article. That was my very first wiki post so give me a minute to clean it up, ok? Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jwheath3 (talk • contribs) 22:35, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AutoWikiBrowser

Hi,

I have approved you for AutoWikiBrowser. You can download it from here. Good luck!

jj137 ^♠ 21:52, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

I checked my watchlist the same minute you added your request. jj137 ^♠ 21:56, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] RE:Opeth Facebook

I reverted your revision because that site is indeed Opeth's official Facebook. WP:EL discourages MySpaces and other such sites, but if other featured article bands have Myspace sites on their article pages (see Slayer, Godsmack, Megadeth) what prohibits a Facebook page too? I admit, there's a gap in policy there, so I brought it up at Wikipedia talk:External links. Cheers, Master of Puppets ^{Care to share?} 22:47, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Hi, and happy new year to you (just returned to the monitor after a toast with the folks), if it already is 2008 for you, that is. Ontopic: By all means. I removed it in good faith by my interpretation of WP:EL, and because it was added by a use that seemed unexperienced, and i've seen facebook links removed by established editors multiple times. Let's see what the discussion brings up. PS: This doesn't look too pretty! :-) ~ twsX · ^T_C · Typo-Warning! ~ 23:25, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Still six and a half hours to New Years, though I'll be celebrating it with friends in about three. Anyway, on topic; I brought it up at the Help Desk, too, so we'll see what discussion it spawns.

And if you think that isn't pretty you should try viewing my userspace in Internet Explorer... my userpage looks like a hurricane and tornado mated on top of it while an earthquake played a sitar or something. :P Cheers, Master of Puppets ^{Care to share?} 23:29, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

I am using Kubuntu Linux, so no IE for me. :-P You should try making your overkill in design in standard-valid code, so it is displayed properly on all browsers and platforms. =) ~ twsX · ^T_C · Typo-Warning! ~ 23:31, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Naw, I'll keep it this way. Then, when I become world famous and everyone wants to see my userpage, they'll have to switch to Firefox to view it. This is my evil plan. >:) Master of Puppets ^{Care to share?} 23:34, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Commas?

Hi, I'm interested in *why* comma separated lists are better than line-break separated lists. Thanks. Dan Beale-Cocks 11:22, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Hello. My humble apologies for answering your question so late – I didn't notice that subpage-talkpage until now. Most of the reasoning of why line break seperated lists are redundant can be found at this discussion on the talk page of the template in question. There was also a discussion – in which I participated a little more actively – on the WP:MOS talk page, but it is now buried somewhere in the endless deeps of the talk archive, so forgive me for not digging it up. As for my personal reasoning, I am sorry to tell you that I can't give it to you right now, as I have still to outline my reasoning in words (for the sake of the discussion and the subpage to which you replied to), which is one of the things I have on my "to-do list", I just haven't found the time yet. ~ twsX · ^T_C · Typo-Warning! ~ 03:08, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

I started: User:Twsx/Commas_vs._Linebreaks#Why_commas.3F - I am not through the discussion yet, but the majority of the argument are listed. ~ twsX · ^T_C · Typo-Warning! ~ 14:22, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] New essay

Hey Twsx - I just posted an essay at WP:WTAF that I think is relevant to the good work I have seen you do on various band list articles. I would welcome your comments and improvements. UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:29, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for the notice! You have written a great essay; i appreciate your work. It reflects a serious problem (actually, after reading the essay I notice it is broader than I knew it was), and the essay it will be very useful when dealing with new editors. I don't have much to add to it. If something comes to mind I will propose it. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont |<;/span> ~ 21:45, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Your NPWatcher application

Dear Twsx,

Thank you for applying for NPWatcher! You've been approved to use it. Before you run the program, please check the changelog on the application page to see if there is a newer release (or just add the main page (here) to your watchlist). Report any bugs or feature suggestion here. If you need help, feel free to contact me or join NPWatcher.

Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 22:07, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

However, I must note that you never notice the user who created when nominating. I urge you to do so from now on. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 22:07, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Why?

Do you mass change genre lists lay-outs? Is there a good reason? Kameejl ^(Talk) 00:11, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

As I have mentioned multiple times before, I don't go looking for those, I rather change them when I get across them. I have recently "discovered" AWB, and as it happens I seem to get across them more often now. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | ~ 08:26, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

You might have read the rules of use:

* Don't edit too fast; consider opening a bot account if you are regularly making more than a few edits a minute.

* Don't do anything controversial with it.

Kameejl ^(Talk) 10:28, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

I have read all the rules and I am in belief to be following them all. Please, make a point or stop desocializing with me. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | ~ 10:32, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

I can't be more clear. Line breaks vs. comma changes are controversial and insignificant changes, and you use AWB several times a minute to do these kind of changes. Facts. Kameejl ^(Talk) 11:08, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Korn edit

You shouldnt be reverting my edit on the Korn page. There are no references to suggest that Fred Durst is influenced by Korn. Although i'm a fan of both and i know this to be true, it's not fair to just state something on the page without a source which says that Fred is influenced by Korn! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Issueskid (talk • contribs) 23:53, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Naturally, but you shouldn't just put a sentence saying "This sentence needs an inline citation." in the middle of the article. I fixed it now. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | ~ 08:25, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Commas Vs Linebreaks

Hey; I just wanted to let you know I have started a sub page of my own about this "Comma vs Linebreaks" debate; where I am assuming a neutral party. The page isn't there to argue my points, for either you nor anyone else to argue theirs, it is instead there for this edit war to hopefully come to and end, so that you and Navnløs can reach a decision. Please try to engage in the debate here, but please also treat it as just that; a debate to reach an end to the edit war rather then a place to argue your points. The page can be found here - thanks ≈ The Haunted Angel 02:50, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] ARGH

You just couldn't resist could you? Here I was trying to have an argument with another user and you just had to go and report me. You'd do anything to "get me". Well, whatever, there's not really much to be said about that. Let me say one last thing, though. That is, even if I get blocked or w/e, I was still doing the right thing and following the armistice to the tee (for both sides) which is at least more than can be said for you. You have only continued to edit war. Blizzard Beast ^$ODIN$ 23:43, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

You assume too much. You violate wikipedias policy, you get reported. May aswell have been someone else. And eventhough this will go past you: You should really stop accusing me of starting edit wars while you do the same thing, the argument is not getting stronger with restating it times and times again. If you feel I violate WP:EW, report me. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | ~ 23:49, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

You've got to be kidding me. You have been violating WP:EW for a long long time. I do not start edit wars at all. In the past I have done so, but that was long time ago. I only want to keep the peace by keeping to the armistice. You, however, almost keep to it, except (as far as I know) with Amon Amarth and Dissection (I'm guessing this is because you are a fan of their works; and like any good fanboy...). Never mind, I don't think I'll get anything through that thick skull of yours. Blizzard Beast ^$ODIN$ 23:56, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Good. Keep it that way. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | ~ 23:58, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Flagicons

Are you saying we finally agree on something? The other lists have already been reverted by others but I saw you reverted the black metal list. It's a losing battle for the people who want to remove the flagicons. They cannot win. Those lists have been changed before and even almost deleted in the past, but again and again, they are saved. People like them they way they are and that includes the flagicons. You may cast your vote about the flagicons here if you like. Blizzard Beast ^$ODIN$ 21:19, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Well, it's official. Everyone is incredulous that you fall on the flagicon side now. Even User:CircafuciX had this to say: while many remain in favor of flags (even someone like Twsx (not to focus on but I find interesting enough)).. Well, I suppose that also means that people are falling on my side. Not to create a fight with you (that's definitely not what I want), but I already told you. I may have done wrong things in the past, but I'm a "good" guy now (not that you are the "bad" guy). Which is also the reason they took my side when I reported you. We may both be blocked from editing Amon Amarth and Dissection (I notice no one has changed their format) but the admins are on my side. Thatcher already told me that if you change the page again I should report you to him. Scarian even wanted to help by asking me if I wanted the Dissection page blocked, too. So, yes, none of us is perfect, and yes I've fucked up in the past (edit warring and all), but I'm not the same, I realize wikipedia's rules and I'm doing my best to follow them and make wikipedia better and enforce those rules on others. I've been getting a lot of people blocked lately and making more helpful edits than usual. I'm here to do the right thing. I don't know why I feel I have to explain all this to you (I shouldn't need to), but I guess, even if I don't have to justify myself to anyone else, I still want to justify myself somewhat to you as I don't want us to edit war or argue about useless garbage or try to "get" each other. That's my piece. Blizzard Beast ^$ODIN$ 22:06, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Laughable. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | ~ 23:28, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

...Well that's not very nice. But I didn't say anything that wasn't true so think what you want. Blizzard Beast ^$ODIN$ 20:04, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Right, it's not actually new that you state people were on your side, so my surprise was probably misplaced. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | ~ 21:09, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

I suppose... Blizzard Beast ^$ODIN$ 21:16, 7 March 2008 (UTC)