Talk:Twokinds
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Characters
I added a characters section.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.171.93.35 (talk)
[edit] Working on it...
Not to worry, the "Storyline" Area will be done soon. Vikedal 05:29, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Invocation of WP:IAR
I'm invoking WP:IAR, except by refusal by anyone for the next... oh, Let's give it 5 days, just to be fair.
Invoked because: WP:WEB, a "Guideline" for articles, is being used to AfD Many webcomic articles. I personally believe Wikipedia can be and is improved by well-written, or at least Moderately-well-written Webcomic Articles. After All, Most articles here on Wikipedia start out as stubs.
I'll also be invoking WP:CON for the application of WP:IAR. Let's find a way that'll work. Temporarily (Beginning 5 days from 10/28/2007, 12:01AM EDT), however, I am (May Be) Instating IAR for the purpose of improving and bettering the article.
If a rule prevents you from working with others to improve or maintain Wikipedia, ignore it.
Vikedal 04:28, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Done
[edit] Deletion due to Notability
Honestly folks, is the widespread deletion of webcomic-related articles really necessary? I understand that there are many webcomics with few or no fans that update once or twice then get abandonned, but TwoKinds is not one of these. Neither are many others, but that's another argument altogether. TwoKinds is a comic with a large fanbase that has been updating pretty regularly for four years. That, in and of itself, should make it notable. There is no terrifying shortage of electrons, as far as I am aware, so the deletion of this article seems like more of a jab at the webcomics community than a necessary or valuable action. - Nick —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.63.228.93 (talk) 21:11, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
I think it should remain, you are saying the webcomic is notable. But you also said they are too many webcomics that are really popular. Deletion of this article is unnecessary, since there it has a large fanbase, including new readers. It is notable, KEEP.
SilverWerewolf 8:11, 06 November 2007 (UTC)
With the "many others" thing I was actually trying to imply that a lot of notable comics have been deleted unfairly. - Nick —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.63.228.6 (talk) 18:51, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] New image
I think the new header image from the site (http://2kinds.com/images/twokindsv6_1.jpg) should be used as a sample picture instead of the current one. This to reflect changes in drawing style (and personally I think the new image is a lot clearer too). AtteAzu (talk) 01:49, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
Done