Talk:Two knights endgame

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chess, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chess. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-Importance on the importance scale.

[edit] old talk

HELP!! It would be good if Search could find this article by what I think is the more common spelling in English, Troitsky, but I don't know how to do it.

Do you mean a redirect of the page name? See WP:R for help if this is what you mean. Stephen Compall 23:16, 11 May 2005 (UTC)


Yes, that is what I mean. Thank you for the pointer! Now I can do it. Bubba73


[edit] Better name?

Would it be better to have this article be about checkmate (or impossibility thereof) for two knights or two knights versus a pawn, rather than just the Troitzky line? (I think so.) The T. line would still play a prominant role. Bubba73 (talk), 00:35, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

If so, some material from checkmate can be moved to this article. Bubba73 (talk), 05:28, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
Well, I did it, moving it from Triotzky line to this article, which is broader and can contain a little more material. Bubba73 (talk), 21:17, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Rephrase required

Surely there's a better way to phrase "There are also mating positions with the inferior side's king on the edge of the board rather than in the corner" ? Tar7arus 19:41, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

How about taking out "rather than in the corner"? Bubba73 (talk), 23:17, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
I was actually more worried about "Mating positions"... Tar7arus 16:07, 13 January 2007 (UTC)