Talk:Twilight (Buffy the Vampire Slayer)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This Buffyverse-related article is part of WikiProject Buffyverse, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Buffy, Angel & the rest of the Buffyverse. You can help! Visit the project page, episode checklist or discuss an article at the project talk-page.
Buffy Portal

Removed "plans to kill Buffy" as I don't believe that he states that that is specifically part of his plans. -Mike —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.244.31.176 (talk) 23:54, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Tightened up the page a bit: fixed some spelling errors and removed a bit which stated that it had been confirmed that Twilight was a male from Buffy's past who had betrayed her, since that has not been confirmed in the comics. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.173.163.117 (talk) 04:18, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Notability and References

Tagging this for notability and references is accurate, but premature. Material featuring this fictional character is currently being published; expect academic discussion, suitable for references, to follow later. While Buffy the Vampire Slayer has spawned many secondary references over the years, they have never been as contemporaneous as our esteemed Wikipedia editors who have noted their absence in this case. Jclemens (talk) 05:12, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Why is the tag premature? It simply reflects that the article as it stands does not have secondary sources and hasn't met the requirements of WP:FICTION.--Fabrictramp (talk) 16:54, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
If you're looking at it that way, and no one's proposing deletion on theose bases, no harm done. On the other hand, there's simply no way this article could meet those standards yet, so the tagging won't serve any immediate purpose to motivate editors to contribute, since there's not yet anything sufficient for them to reference. Jclemens (talk) 03:31, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Ok, I've done some more work. We have NINE cites now: three primary source, four of non-blog industry sites(Follow the TV Guide link to see what's there: an editorial conversation starter, rather than user-generated content) and two from reviewed/edited sites. So I'm once again believing in good faith that we have enough to meet the notability and verification requirements of WP:FICTION and going to remove the tags again. Jclemens (talk) 23:30, 27 March 2008 (UTC)