User talk:TusharN

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 Changing name of an article 2 Re:Sorry 3 Re:Curiosity 4 Tags 5 I get it, you don't like people who delete articles 6 Attention ! 7 Re:How? 8 Article parodies 9 Re:Advice me... 10 Non-free use disputed for Image:Baygon Products.jpg 11 Non-free use disputed for Image:Baygon Logo.gif 12 Non-free use disputed for Image:Bisleri Logo.JPEG 13 Non-free use disputed for Image:Bisleri Bottle.JPG 14 Image help 15 Non-free use disputed for Image:Paras Pharma Logo.JPG 16 Non-free use disputed for Image:Paras Pharma Export Map.jpg 17 Non-free use disputed for Image:Timewarp.jpeg 18 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Nippos Offices.gif 19 Paras Pharmaceuticals 20 Nippo 21 Baygon

[edit] Changing name of an article

You need to click on the "move" tab at the top of the page and enter the new name and your reason for moving it. Regarding the Gekko Emulator article, I would check first whether it should be Gekko (emulator) or Gekko (Emulator). I'm not sure what the standard format is, but I would lean toward the first. Leebo⁸⁶ 15:04, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

I agree. "emulator" should be lower-case as it is not a name. Fan-1967 17:36, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re:Sorry

It "affects" me as much as anyone else to be personally attacked. I don't allow it to affect my decisions when editing, but it's an official policy at Wikipedia, so I'm reminding you in the hopes that you won't say such things to other editors. Leebo⁸⁶ 16:31, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

It's your prerogative to "give up" if you so choose, but the burden is on the editors who wish to include the information to properly cite it with reliable sources. I've asked for this and no one attempted to add any. I'm not an administrator. I can't delete anything. I initiated a discussion, and the current consensus in the discussion is to delete it. That could change if you address the issues, but it won't otherwise. Leebo⁸⁶ 16:37, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re:Curiosity

I don't think it's fair that I should have to explain my actions, since I always follow Wikipedia policy, and I strongly believe in the betterment of the encyclopedia, but I'll answer you be cause you seem to be confused about the perceived "attack" on your page in particular. I believe I said it before, but I'll say it again; deleting an article is not a statement about the creator or the subject, it's a process to meet the standards.

1. I can't delete anything, because I'm not an administrator. If you're curious about how many discussions I've participated in for deleting articles, I can tell you it's clearly going to be far more weighted toward deletion for anyone participating in XfD discussions. I've personally started 3 articles (working on a 4th) and I've tagged or discussed the deletion of hundreds. I'm sure that was your point, to somehow prove that I go out my way to remove other editors' contributions. That's not the case; we have standards, and 99% of the articles I've tagged don't even come close to meeting them (stuff like "Hey, I'm Jim and I just made my own Wikipedia article about myself!"). It's not a fair comparison to make, and it's going to be the same for most people who contribute to those discussions. Additionally, I make many edits to existing articles.
2. As indicated above, I'm a regular editor. I take part in discussions such as those at articles for deletion regularly, not just yours. But I have no ability to delete articles, just the ability to tag and discuss them like anyone can.
3. My purpose at Wikipedia is to assist in building a large and reliable encyclopedia. To that end, I contribute content when I can, and I assist in removing content that does not meet that distinction.
4. Azureus is a RAM hog, but I like the interface and have a lot of RAM, so… yes? Leebo⁸⁶ 20:18, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Tags

Any other important tags would be helpful. Please post them here ( not on my user page) *~TusharN~* 13:47, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] I get it, you don't like people who delete articles

Why not put this on your userpage instead of implying that removing content is "bad". You can also find more userboxes here. Leebo⁸⁶ 14:52, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Attention !

I TusharN, am going away on a school trip for 7 days. During these deven days, i would appreciate it if no one adds "prod" tags to my articles, as you people are soooo fond of doing. I will return on the 15th of February 2007. DO NOT TAKE ADVANTAGE OF MY ABSENCE ! That is not the honourable way... i guess... *~TusharN~* 07:56, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re:How?

If you click on "my preferences" at the top of the screen, you'll see that one of the boxes you can fill in on that first tab is for your signature (you probably knew this since yours is customized already). In my box, I have HTML code to make my sig look like this. This is what it says: <font color="#00688B"><b>[[User:Leebo86|Leebo]]</b></font><small>^{<font color="B22222">[[User_Talk:Leebo86|86]]</font>}</small>. You'll need to know some basic HTML to do it, but you can look at mine to get a better idea. Leebo⁸⁶ 12:23, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Article parodies

Hi. You asked a while back about writing parody articles. If I may, I'd direct you to Uncyclopedia, where parody, absurd and humorous articles are asked for. I have also spent a fair amout of time there, however have not contributed much or anything for the past months. Cheers, Ouro (blah blah) 19:53, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Hi. No problem, have fun over there! Cheers, Ouro (blah blah) 16:55, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re:Advice me...

My advice would be to remove the list of products, and tone down the way you describe the hospital. The part about "care, not just cure" sounds like something you'd hear in an ad for the hospital. Basically, your article should focus more on the significance of the company rather than what they sell. I suggest adding some information from articles written about the company. Have they been featured in any newspapers or industry magazines? How about making a "History" section? Those would probably help. Leebo ^T/C 13:53, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Baygon Products.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Baygon Products.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:45, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Baygon Logo.gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Baygon Logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:45, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Bisleri Logo.JPEG

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Bisleri Logo.JPEG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 14:56, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Bisleri Bottle.JPG

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Bisleri Bottle.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 14:56, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image help

A fair use rationale is a description of why the use of a particular logo does not infringe upon the copyright of the creator. It's usually a bulleted list describing the source, the resolution of the image, the purpose of the original and the one being used, etc. You can get a template that has spaces to place all that information with {{non-free media rationale}}. Apply that template to the image pages in question with the info filled in and that should be sufficient for saving them from deletion. Let me know if you need more help. Leebo ^T/C 21:46, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Paras Pharma Logo.JPG

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Paras Pharma Logo.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:20, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Paras Pharma Export Map.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Paras Pharma Export Map.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:20, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Timewarp.jpeg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Timewarp.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:45, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Nippos Offices.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Nippos Offices.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:32, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Paras Pharmaceuticals

A tag has been placed on Paras Pharmaceuticals, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mbisanz (talk) 07:45, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Nippo

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Nippo, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Nippo. Mbisanz (talk) 07:50, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Baygon

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Baygon, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Baygon. Mbisanz (talk) 07:51, 18 December 2007 (UTC)