Talk:Tusk (album)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is part of WikiProject California, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
The article has not been rated for quality and/or importance yet. Please rate the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

I admit I don't have a clue what these guys were up to with regards to releasing this album (is it a full cover of the original Fleetwood Mac album?) but shouldn't this page be about the Fleetwood Mac release, with mention of Camper Van Beethoven, whoever they are, releasing... whatever it is they released? nknight 17:13 Dec 31, 2002 (UTC)

I'd say it should be about the original.. Fleetwood Mac was first. If anything, this artist could get a mention at the bottom of the FM tusk article - or maybe as part of the article itself. -Jazz77

Done. Something about it seems a bit off, though. Perhaps I shouldn't try rewriting articles so soon after waking up :). nknight 06:46 Jan 1, 2003 (UTC)

Contents 1 Move? 2 NPOV 3 Bonus tracks of reissue 4 Drug use

[edit] Move?

Camper van Beethoven released an album by this same name several years ago. I move that this article be moved to reflect the difference. --ZekeMacNeil 17:59, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Moved to where, exactly? And why? Their release is just a cover of the original, and is mentioned at the bottom of the page. -- nknight 05:08, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)

[edit] NPOV

As much as I enjoy the flowing prose that currently graces the article, someone (with knowledge of the album) should rewrite so it's a little more objective.ProfessorFokker 07:00, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Bonus tracks of reissue

Would it not be of good taste to include information on bonus material of remaster? It makes good sense if we want to give information on the songs of band.

[edit] Drug use

Anyone think it would be worth mentioning Lindsey's well-known cocaine use during the time this album was recorded? I think it might be worth mentioning, since it definately influenced his erratic and fast-paced songwriting style on the album. Thoughts? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tprayx (talk • contribs) 20:14, 28 September 2007 (UTC)