User talk:Turlo Lomon/history6

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents

Artemis Entreri

I saw on your page that you claim to be neutral on controversial issues, yet on the Artemis Entreri page you clearly said he was lawful evil. Why?Maxxiboy 02:10, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

I reviewed the talk page, and it appears my comments were shifted down from where they were originally a reply. They are very out of context. I have to yield to other contributers' opinions on the recent books because I haven't been able to get caught up on my reading yet. My originaly post stated TN. An event in a book I haven't read pointed out this was incorrect, so I yielded to that person's analysis until I had a chance to read the book. I'll modify the talk page accordingly. Turlo Lomon 12:14, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

I apologize, for I was unaware that you had not read all the books; and now I can see how one might come to the conclusion of him being evil. All I ask is that you keep your mind more open about Artemis Entreri's character; I thank you, and happy reading. Maxxiboy 20:17, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia Greyhawk

Is there a chance you can fix that Greyhawk Wikipedia Project info box? It looks kind of silly the way it currently is. Thanks. Turlo Lomon 05:36, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

I agree. The best thing would probably be to find a free (not fair-use) image to use. (It would seem that the previous one was deleted?) I'll do some searching this weekend... If you find any you feel appropriate, let me know : ) - jc37 12:30, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Re:Drizzt Do'Urden's scimitars

Yes I agree. Also I must comend you on your work on that particular page. I read the books but I dont play the games but a good page all in all!Drizzt Jamo 11:29, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for the positive feedback. I hope to do the same with some other articles. Turlo Lomon 12:08, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

psion

yo man, guess what, i didn't see it was you. whatever you like, just do it. i thought was some freak messing up with original research. i just think there are more important things to do then focusing on this psion thing or whatever, especially on a man who is not. don't see the point. psion or not it is not a very popular term.

--Cynehelm 12:23, 22 March 2007 (UTC)


Against the Giants

I've started fixing up Against the Giants and remembered you had talked about something similar at the D&D project page. Some other users and I have been working on how to format these module series pages using Dragonlance modules (DL series) as the testbed (see talk page). I'm not ready to make Queen of Spiders just yet, but I may do it in the future. Anyways, thought you might like to know. - Peregrine Fisher 01:19, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Cutter

It would take a bit of looking through the books, but I'm sure I could gather as much information on Cutter, or Khazid'Hea (I think the actual name is), as is needed for a new article. I'll need to know what happens in what book for the references, but I already know a bunch. I'm in the progress of reading the short story "Comrades at Arms" in the Realms of the Elves anthology, and I've found that Cutter is a prominent "character" as it is now being wielded by Tos'Un from the Hunter's Blades Trilogy (not sure how well versed on the books you are, but you've got to know a bit if you created the "Drizzt's Scimitars" page, right? If you're interested I'll do my best to help you in the creation of a page for this sword... just post back on my talk page... thanks!

Darkedge

My Article "Temperature distribution equation in three dimensional system" has pdf file attached with it. All the explanation is given on the pdf file only. If Possible make the file to be redirected.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Aravinthane (talkcontribs)

Where is the attached PDF file? This is an encylopedia, and as such, it should be self sufficient. The article consisted of a link to an image. This isn't enough to meet the minimum criteria for an article. My nomination for SD stands. Turlo Lomon 11:15, 26 April 2007 (UTC)


D&D wiki project consensus

A call to all members of the D&D wiki project. We are currently having a major dispute that needs to be settled by all members of the D&D wiki project. The dispute is as follows. 1. Should we put disambiguation tags on D&D articles preemptively or should we wait until there is an article conflict with some other Wikipedia article. Vote on preemptive or wait.

2. What should we label these tags? Example "child's play (module)", or "child's play (adventure)" and at this point we are taking all suggestions.

email me at Dm2ortiz@aol.com or post on the D&D wiki project talk page Dm2ortiz 13:45, 12 June 2007 (UTC)


Bunnies and Burrows

And I thank you for all your help as well! Web Warlock 15:45, 11 September 2007 (UTC)


Thanks!

Thanks for all the work you are putting in the articles and discussions about GURPS books! --Goochelaar 21:45, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

The funny part is, I don't even play GURPS currently. I haven't for over 10 years. Thank you for the feedback, though. And thank you for fixing my random typos. It is nuts trying to keep up with Gavin. Turlo Lomon 21:47, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Just wanted to echo the "thanks" given already. Excellent job locating all those refs for GURPS Discworld! --Craw-daddy | T | 23:32, 15 September 2007 (UTC)


Barnstar

I Angelbo award you this Barnstar for your game and RPG related contributions
I Angelbo award you this Barnstar for your game and RPG related contributions

Dear Turlo Lomon
Here is a Barnstar for you. You show the community that you are a well-versed contributer, so for all your contributions to RPG related articles on wikipedia, and for clearing up and responding swiftly to AfD submitted by Gavin Collins, you get this pointy little star.
Best regards and happy editing
Mads Angelbo Talk / Contribs 19:33, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Rebuttal

I had a look at a few other RFC pages, and although I don't want to dampen your enthusiasm, it does not appear to be standard procedure to have a rebuttal section[1] on my RFC page as it looks a little like overkill. Don't you think you should only be able to hang a man once? I suggest moving it to the discussion page, and then we can all answer it. --Gavin Collins 21:09, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Done, with my apologies. This is a new process for me. Turlo Lomon 00:15, 10 October 2007 (UTC)