Talk:Tunnel vision

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tunnel vision article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at the doctor's mess.
Start	This page has been rated as Start-Class on the quality assessment scale
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance assessment scale

[edit] Comments

Ummm . . . isn't the phrase "peripheral vision"?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Wiwaxia (talk • contribs) 00:37, 25 October 2003 (UTC).

Ummm . . . How about making the correction without annoying commentary?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.65.185.2 (talk • contribs) 15:15, 20 July 2005 (UTC).

Bitemporal hemianopia is different from tunnel vision, and suggests different pathology. Please do not merge them. 203.166.99.230 08:54, 31 August 2007 (UTC)TT

How is it different? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.115.37.130 (talk) 02:12, 20 January 2008 (UTC) At a first glance, I see that tunnel vision is like seeing only a tiny portion of what you actually see (just a small, round area) while bitempora---whatever is missing half of each side of vision. It's the difference between a circle and a rectangle. --Heero Kirashami (talk) 02:50, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

So just because the two symptoms are different in the SHAPE of the vision they can see, they are not different? NO! They are different. They are different Period. Shakermover (talk) 04:53, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Tunnel vision

In management we speak of 'Tunnel vision' when departments are not able to see the bigger picture and focus on their own objectives. I think a page discussing this would be a good addition. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.108.214.219 (talk) 14:39, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Web searching

I would argue for Tunnel Vision article to remain separate as it is now. I specifically did a search on "wiki tunnel vision" and it took me straight here and within the first few sentences the article answered my query in a concise way, rather than it be embedded within some other article. Also I believe Tunnel vision is a common enough term to warrant it's own page. 203.94.152.66 (talk) 03:17, 27 May 2008 (UTC)Ian Strange