Talk:Tualatin Plains Presbyterian Church
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This page is part of WikiProject Oregon, a WikiProject dedicated to articles related to the U.S. state of Oregon. To participate: join (or just read up) at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion. |
|
| PSU stuff & Applegate Trail are the current Collaborations of the week. | ||
| Start | This page is rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. | |
| Low | This article is rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. | |
 |
This article is within the scope of the National Register of Historic Places WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of listings on the U.S. National Register of Historic Places. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. |
[edit] Infobox
I'm looking at the name at the top of the infobox. My assumption would have been that the name shown there would be the name by which the property is listed in the NRHP (i.e. Old Scotch Church), rather than the operational name of the property owner. . . . -Ipoellet 03:11, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- That would be true if it was only here because of the NRHP, but it was not started as an NRHP article. That was added after the article was started and is secondary to the church's history. The title of the infobox matches the article title. But even the church is conflicted with what name to go with if you look at their website. Also, it's not that they are the property owner, that is the church name, with the Old Scotch Church being the nikename that is now far more common in use. Sort of like calling Bill Clinton Bill instead of William. Aboutmovies 16:56, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- I'm not sure I see the need for the article title and the infobox name to match, especially given that the infobox is specifically about the NRHP listing. I acknowledge the difference between the proper name and the nickname, but the church is on the NRHP under O rather than T, so I would think the infobox would reflect that. But I'm happy for the call to be yours. G'day! -Ipoellet 18:07, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
