User talk:True Steppa

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome

Hello True Steppa! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking Image:Signature icon.png or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! -- Levine2112 discuss 22:08, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

[edit] Garage merge

Hey, just wanted to say nice one for being bold and doing something about that Garage (dance music) fiasco. Someone needed to eventually! Keep up the good work. - Zeibura S. Kathau (Info | Talk) 02:04, 6 May 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Photek - Form and Function Vol 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Photek - Form and Function Vol 2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:25, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

True Steppa, there is no adequate information about "funky house." The data is vague and doesn't mention it. You probably made it up. Also, the electronic music styles provides data on the music genre. So, it stays. Fclass (talk) 15:56, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

It is only your opinion. Martin Clark is a respectable journalist (The Guardian, Pitchfork, Vice Magazine etc) ...and read the WP:LINKS.--True Steppa (talk) 18:43, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

It is not an opinion. The information is vague, inadequate, and there's no mention of "funky house." Also, Martin Clark's respectability is not an issue. If you keep adding it, I will keep deleting it. Fclass (talk) 21:49, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

"If you keep adding it, I will keep deleting it" - such destructive acts are called vandalism.--True Steppa (talk) 01:44, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Dude, the information is inadequate and vague. It doesn't mention "funky house" anywhere. Where's the history? Seriously, it doesn't have good data. Also, the links don't work well, and it's not an opinion. Just stop, man. Fclass (talk) 14:18, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Do not delete the electronic music styles external link. It's fine, unlike your madde-up mess. The "funky house" page has no relevant and adequate data and it's vague. It doesn't present anything about it. So, knock it off. Fclass (talk) 18:39, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Edit War

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Template:UK garage. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 19:53, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Please discuss the matter before reverting further. There is discussion ongoing at the Administrator's Noticeboard related to this topic. Thank you! UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 20:05, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Still haven't learned your lesson, huh? Fclass (talk) 14:34, 12 May 2008 (UTC)