Talk:Trusted Execution Technology
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Cleanup
The atricle's comma placement and syntax seems a bit off to me. I'd place a cleanup template, but haven't yet figured out how. Also, the vocabulary seems a bit advertish to me.
Orange & Viridian 09:35, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
- i'm not a native english speaker . if you wish to correct my mystakes ,you're welcome. Dbiagioli 13:16, 30 December 2005 (UTC)DBiagioli
[edit] la grande main use
Where did you found the info that the TPM is designed to withstand physical attack ? and the packaging is designe to self-destruct ? could you provide a link please?Dbiagioli 07:17, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] POV
This phrase is extremely POV: "aimed at giving users, especially in the business segment, a way to defend themselves against software-based attacks aimed at stealing sensitive information".
This is the POV of DRM proponents. OTOH, my POV is that it is aimed at taking freedom away from users, rendering them incapable of defending themselves. Please make this phrase more neutral. For example, it could start with "Intel claims that it is aimed at....", and then followed by "OTOH, opponents of DRM think that...".
See: POV, Digital_restriction_management#Controversy.
- done Dbiagioli 15:23, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
Robertmh 09:15, 21 May 2007 (UTC)