Talk:Troy Pannell

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Sports and games work group.
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.
Flag
Portal
Troy Pannell is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
This article is supported by WikiProject AFL.
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Australia because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WP Australia}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WP Australia}} template, removing {{WP Australia}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.
To-do list for Troy Pannell:
Expand using media coverage
  1. Free kicks up 40% - Herald Sun, 2007-04-03
  2. Ump who said sorry - The Age (sporting life), 2005-04-28
  3. Congratulations Troy Pannell - Essendon District Football League, 2005-04-10

[edit] Speedy tag

I contest that, it doesn't meet any speedy deletion criterion. As an elite sportsperson, it passes WP:BIO. This certainly isn't A7 material, as that's a notability assertion. Would suggest AFD if anyone doesn't agree. --Michael Billington (talk) 06:10, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

I have requested the help of an expert to see if what you believe isn't speedy deletion criteria is or not but having a article for an individual referee seems a bit silly if you ask me. If we did that for all referee that would be too many articles to count. Plus the fact he has refereed 28 games isn't appear to be a reason for notability. Xtreme racer 06:25, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 16:39, 31 August 2007 (UTC)