Talk:Tropical Storm Nicholas (2003)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good article Tropical Storm Nicholas (2003) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
Featured topic star Tropical Storm Nicholas (2003) is part of the "2003 Atlantic hurricane season" series (project page), a featured topic identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do.
Hurricanes
 This page is within the scope of WikiProject Tropical cyclones, which collaborates on tropical cyclones and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance within WikiProject Tropical cyclones.

Contents

[edit] Track map

Well, don't you think it is better to show the whole track of Nicholas instead of cutting off a bit of the extratropical part?????? The track in that part is quite interesting to show in full. That's what I think anyway. RaNdOm26 15:36, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Probably right.--Nilfanion (talk) 16:13, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
Well, good luck with that. RaNdOm26 16:35, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Todo

Alright, I just finished redoing the article. What more is needed for B class? Hurricanehink (talk) 16:37, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Meh, provide a link for "wind shear" and "convection" in the intro. Also, I think the headings should be "Storm history", and "Impact, records and naming" (only the first letter is capitalised). LOL RaNdOm26 16:44, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
For Reference #21, you cannot cite Wikipedia as a source. Maybe have a look at WP:RS#Using Wikipedia as a source, though I am not sure how it really works. RaNdOm26 16:52, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
I'm only showing where I got the ACE stuff. Mainly it's there to show the other ACE's. I tried linking ACE by storm, but I couldn't fit into the article, so I ref'd it. Most importantly, though, I linked the best track, which is where all the ACE stuff comes from. Hurricanehink (talk) 22:38, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] GA passed

As of 9 November 2006, per WP:WIAGA, this article passed for Good Article status. It's a nice small article with well-written crisp prose. It is also well-referenced and well-illustrated. Thank you for the editors for such a wonderful work. — Indon (reply) — 22:44, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] GA Sweeps Review: Pass

As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2006. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would also be beneficial to go through the article and update all of the access dates of the inline citations and fix any dead links. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have added an article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 07:05, 14 April 2008 (UTC)