Talk:Tropical Depression One (1992)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tropical Depression One (1992) article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	Tropical Depression One (1992) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
	An entry from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on February 28, 2007.
Article milestones Date Process Result March 7, 2007 Good article nominee Listed May 25, 2008 Good article reassessment Kept Current Status: Good article

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Tropical cyclones, which collaborates on tropical cyclones and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details.
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance within WikiProject Tropical cyclones.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
GA	This article has been rated as GA-class on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Contents 1 Assessment 2 GAC 3 TC rainfall image 4 GA Sweeps Review: Pass

[edit] Assessment

Congrats on the third tropical depression article ever written (and stayed). B-Low for now.Mitchazenia 14:17, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] GAC

I assessed this article on the following criteria:

1. Well-written: Pass
2. Factually accurate: Pass
3. Broad: Pass
4. Neutrally written: Pass
5. Stable: Pass
6. Well-referenced: Pass
7. Images: Pass

Congratulations, it passes! It's hard sometimes to even bother reading the article before passing if I see it's been nominated by User:Hurricanehink, but I did it anyways. A very concise, clear article. Good job!

[edit] TC rainfall image

For whatever reason, the rainfall image for this system was never completed, and this was not noticed until last night. It is one of the oldest graphics within the project, and no one ever mentioned it. It is the last cyclone for the continent to be converted into the new color filled graphics (yay for me). Expect it to be ready by early morning tomorrow. Thegreatdr 18:55, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Very cool, glad to hear that. :) Hurricanehink (talk) 19:04, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

It's available now on the website. Thegreatdr 03:06, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] GA Sweeps Review: Pass

As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2007. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would also be beneficial to go through the article and update all of the access dates of the inline citations and fix any dead links. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 21:15, 25 May 2008 (UTC)