User talk:Tripping Nambiar
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Jawaharlal Nehru
Hi. I greatly appreciate your help Preetikapoor0 (talk) 21:25, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks Again Preetikapoor0 (talk) 18:01, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- Hi, Can you share your opinion here. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Jawaharlal_Nehru#Coco_Islands
.It will be very helpful in resolving this edit dispute. Preetikapoor0 (talk) 03:14, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
You have deleted the description paragraph under the article "KAUL" in wiki, calling it rubbish. However, this discription is not only close but quite apt (even though its generalising). When you delete an article w/o prior discussion, it shows that you are not open to new ideas / concepts. You may share your opinion / any other point of view. If you disagree, kindly sight examples.
Ambar wiki (talk) 10:43, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] need your help
Hi Tripping Nambiar, There is massive vandalism taking place on the page Knanaya. despite references from many works the passages are constantly being vandalised and pov tag is put up without any references being provided. An editor first put up text as anonymous without references and now with a new sock puppet is again reverting to the unreferenced pov text written as anonymous. Please help this page. thanks Vagab (talk) 19:04, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi i was wondering if you are interested in cleaning up the KNM page from vandalising extremists? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Joeblckw (talk • contribs) 19:39, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] 3RR
You've broken it. Revert yourself. --Relata refero (disp.) 08:57, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Dravidian languages
I don't see it. Is the text you're quoting from the Dravidian languages article or some other article? (Apologies if I was wrong.) --Regents Park (roll amongst the roses) 13:14, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
I found it. Apologies!--Regents Park (roll amongst the roses) 13:16, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Hi Tripping Nambiar
Hi Tripping Nambiar I've moved the recent section added to a more appropriate section in the article. Also, most this data is from Britannica that is sourced from sources, which are over 100 years old and out of date (some of the sources are bias & a have a negative propaganda context) and need to be reviewed & edited thoroughly before remaining in the article. For the meanwhile I've moved them to the appropriate section. Stay well. Thanks.--Historian info (talk) 15:01, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
- Hi friend. Let me first say I really appreciate your help with article so thank you and well done. However, friend we must always remember when we are using sources, which are 100 years old, and from the British Empire that they usually are not neutral and the political propaganda must be taken out of them before we put them on wikipedia. They must be neutral; most British Empire sources, which are 100 years old, are heavily anti south Asian and portray South Asian as primitive and inferior. Finally, I like to say again I really appreciate your help with article so thank you and well done. P.S. Keep an eye out for vandals. The article is semi protected for now but when it expires the vandal will be back, we must protect it. Stay well.--Historian info (talk) 15:13, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Madan Mohan Malaviya
Hi, You removed the confusing tag, I didn't because this sentence is confusing for me also: "This event included the caste Hindu priest at the temple." What does it mean? Can you rephrase the sentence? Thanks. GDibyendu (talk) 13:50, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Zakir Naik
Your recent comment on the Zakir Naik talk page was notable. It would be helpful if you could put in more support and ensure that the article remains balanced, by restating your viewpoint on the talk page. Thanks - Agnistus (talk) 23:13, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
