User talk:Triplejumper
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
Contents |
[edit] disruption
Don't allow yourself to be baited into becoming part of the disruption. It will look much better if everyone simply ignores the side comments. Getting other editors distracted into side-line discussions is a tactic used to defeat a mediation process. Peace in God. Lsi john 22:57, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re:Landmark Education litigation
Just FYI, the reason I originally removed the heading "Defending against Slander and Libel" was because at that time every case cited on the page was under that heading (some problem with the nesting of the headings I suppose), including cases that had nothing to do with slander or libel. Your "semi-reversion" seems to have fixed this, as now only the cases actually involving slander and libel fall under the heading. -Elmer Clark 03:12, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Been vs. Weed and Landmark Education Corporation
Revision as of 22:25, 12 November 2007 (edit)Triplejumper (Talk | contribs)(→Been vs. Weed and Landmark Education Corporation (2002, 2006) - sorry but there seems to be some hidden formatting that I can't fix)
You need to contact an admin before deleting large chunks because of a formatting issue. Arcana imperii Ascendo tuum 00:31, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Igbo people
Hi, since you are the primary contributor of the article Igbo people, I am asking you that it you will be good if you use some more inline citation in the article. And the "Culture" section, the religion part should be expanded. Thank you. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 19:37, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
-
- I would be glad to. Triplejumper (talk) 19:35, 11 April 2008 (UTC)