User talk:Triggtay

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

→Journalist >>talk<< 01:31, 9 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Hemoglobin C

Actually, if you look at the bottom of the page you linked to (from which the text is clipped), you will see "Copyright 2005, A.D.A.M., Inc. Any duplication or distribution of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited." If you click on Copyright at the bottom you'll find "When using NLM Web sites, you may encounter documents or other information resources contributed or licensed by private individuals, companies, or organizations that may be protected by U.S. and foreign copyright laws. Transmission or reproduction of protected items beyond that allowed by fair use (PDF) as defined in the copyright laws requires the written permission of the copyright owners." This leads me to believe it is not public domain. I'm afraid I will have to delete it again. If you want to recreate the article using that as a source, but not directly copied, please do. -R. fiend 15:35, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

No problem. My bad too, really. I didn't actually know it was a copyvio until after you told me it wasn't. I was going through a few hundred articles tagged as speedy deletion candidates, and when you deal with that many you can't give them all the attention they may deserve. I could tell it was clipped from another source, anyway, the "return to tops" throughout the article (which caused me to call it "nonsense", not that it was, but I have little patience for such slovenliness, something to think about in the future:)) gave it away. But it certainly seems like a topic that could use an article. Feel free to write one. But do leave out "return to tops". -R. fiend 02:28, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Leukocyte alkaline phosphatase

Please do not copy text from copyrighted pages, such as leukocyte alkaline phosphatase. MedlinePlus, apart from being redundant in information (not every page needs a description of phlebotomy), is copyrighted as R_fiend pointed out above. JFW | T@lk 10:37, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

MedlinePLUS is © A.D.A.M. There are other National Institutes of Health pages that are US government work and hence PD for Wikipedia. I looked on the NHLBI site but could not find an equivalent page. In fact, most of the pages that come up in Google have the same ADAM content.

As a matter of fact, it is also possible to actually write the article from scratch, using the MedlinePLUS article as a source of information but paraphrased. This is more work and would require reading up about EC 3.1.3.1, finding its relevant OMIM entry, and dipping into a medical textbook for the interpretation of the LAP score. Frankly, the LAP score is rarely performed in the UK, where I work.

Whence your interest in haematology? JFW | T@lk 21:28, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Category

A good place to start to find a more specific category, or develop a better understanding of their uses is located at Wikipedia:Category...--MONGO 01:09, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Buffalo Soldiers Movie

Released in 2001 or 2003. The article appears to contradict itself by stating that a 2001 release date was delayed 2 years, and then having the release date listed as 2001. Triggtay 07:57, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for making the above comment on my talk page. It did have it's premiere screening in September 2001, but it's wider theatrical run came in 2003. I'll clarify this in the article accordingly. Nuxx 09:58, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] arabic wikipedia

hi, just wanted to know if your are planning to work on the Lidocaine article in the arabic wiki. --Tarawneh 02:15, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Fuko promo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Fuko promo.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then you need to specify who owns the copyright, please. If you got it from a website, then a link to the website where it was taken from with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:25, 18 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey 13:25, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Tera Bond

An editor has nominated Tera Bond, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tera Bond and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 20:37, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Ashley_Juggs2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ashley_Juggs2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:31, 14 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 10:31, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Tera Bond

Tera Bond, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Tera Bond satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tera Bond (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Tera Bond during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 05:52, 17 November 2007 (UTC)