User talk:Triaxx2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thanxs for the message! I was about to leave you a message regarding the edits to the Kim Possible page, but you beat me to it. I read the section regarding the Kim and Shego relationship.
It's a controversial statement and contains speculation. As a rule of thumb, Wikipedia does not allow for fan speculation and original research. Don't get me wrong, I'm a huge fan of Kim Possible (I've seen every episode at lease three or four times). However, please discuss controversial edits on the talk pages before making them. After a consensus is made, then the appropriate edits can be made without controversy.
I know Erased Paper is also active in another Kim Possible forum (I forget the name), but I'm only active in Wikipedia. I hope I did not discourage you from editing. Be bold, but not reckless. Have fun editing! =) Jumping cheese ^Cont@ct 03:07, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

I believe that whole homosexual issue is controversial for a children show. The WP:OR rule kind of applies here. The other listing in the "Love interests" section are verifiable and canon. If you feel strongly regarding kigo, please create a page at Kigo (Kim Possible) (since kigo already exists). ^_^ Jumping cheese ^Cont@ct 03:26, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Kigo (Kim Possible)

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Kigo (Kim Possible), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Kigo (Kim Possible). Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. SpuriousQ 20:14, 30 December 2006 (UTC)