Talk:Triborough Bridge

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges, a WikiProject which aims to expand coverage of bridges on Wikipedia. Please feel free to join us.
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. (add assessment comments)
Mid	This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale.

	This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Topics	Interstate Highways New York State routes
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. (add assessment comments)
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	The map in this article is maintained by the Maps task force.

	NYC Portal This article is part of WikiProject New York City, an effort to create, expand, and improve New York City-related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Bulletin: The next New York City meetup is Sunday June 1st.
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale.

Removed the word "significant" from "significant portion of the public transit subsidy." Latest statistics show that B&T contribute less than 20 percent of the subsidy to public transit - "significant" seems to suggest a larger fraction, though of course it is a somewhat subjective term (hence it is probably best that it be left out).

I have added the photographing ban based on the last time that I have seen the signs "USE OF CAMERAS PROHIBITED - STRICTLY ENFORCED". It is due to fears that any terrorists may use images to plot terrirosms. Should the situation changes, please just update.--Jusjih 09:44, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Not Encyclopedic

In what little the article offers, the article seems slanted against the topic. Furthermore, the article saysnoting other than some superficial comments. 67.87.92.56 03:16, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

The article seems biased against the bridge? How? I don't see it. And while I suppose the article could say more -- and perhaps will someday soon -- I can't agree that it is superficial or unencyclopedic.

[edit] More Information

There is not enough information need more charts images diagrams etc. Trulystand700

[edit] Rename?

Has the bridge in fact been renamed? - Denimadept (talk) 01:35, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Not yet but it seems a forgone conclusion. Jim.henderson (talk) 01:46, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Once it happens, we should likely rename this page, then. - Denimadept (talk) 02:08, 6 June 2008 (UTC)